These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12518950)

  • 1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research efficacy trials of bionator class II treatment: a review.
    Jacobs T; Sawaengkit P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):571-5. PubMed ID: 12518950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment needs following activator-headgear therapy.
    Bondevik O
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 8702067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporomandibular disorders after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgears: results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Keeling SD; Garvan CW; King GJ; Wheeler TT; McGorray S
    Semin Orthod; 1995 Sep; 1(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 9002912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contribution to the treatment of the Class II/1 by means of the activator-headgear combination].
    Andrik P
    Stomatol DDR; 1988 Jun; 38(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 3256947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The timing of Class II treatment.
    Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Dolce C; King GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4 Suppl):S66-70. PubMed ID: 16644421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of early treatment on stability of occlusion in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pavlow SS; McGorray SP; Taylor MG; Dolce C; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18249290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.
    Dolce C; Schader RE; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16102404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
    Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The bionator with extraoral traction--the Wurzburg concept. 1].
    Witt E; Sahm G; Hevia R
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 2135591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.