These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12519032)

  • 1. Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive.
    Pratt J; McAuliffe J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1361-70. PubMed ID: 12519032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
    Ansorge U; Heumann M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
    Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wright JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 8189195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contribution of color to attention capture effects during search for onset targets.
    Goller F; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):789-807. PubMed ID: 26742497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.
    Birmingham E; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):101-21. PubMed ID: 15627412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):257-77. PubMed ID: 23151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.
    Pratt J; Hillis J; Gold JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 11700899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Onsets do not override top-down goals, but they are responded to more quickly.
    Wu SC; Remington RW; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 24596080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in attentional set between athletes and nonathletes.
    McAuliffe J
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Oct; 131(4):426-37. PubMed ID: 15523823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.