131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12519341)
1. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine.
Fortin T; Champleboux G; Bianchi S; Buatois H; Coudert JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 12519341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients.
Pettersson A; Komiyama A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 20491812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report.
Ozan O; Seker E; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ersoy AE
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 21767212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing the edentulous mandible using recent technological developments: a case study.
Sethi A; Kaus T; Sharma N; Sochor P
Prim Dent J; 2013 Apr; 2(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 23726493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
