These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1251949)

  • 1. Evaluation of a 'do-it-yourself' pregnancy test.
    Baker LD; Yert LW; Chase MC; Dale E
    Am J Public Health; 1976 Feb; 66(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 1251949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaption of UCG-Lyphotest--a hemagglutination inhibition pregnancy test with human serum or plasma.
    Maloy SW; Maloy SR
    Am J Med Technol; 1974 Aug; 40(8):368-70. PubMed ID: 4850429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable accuracy of home pregnancy tests: truth in advertising?
    Grenache DG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 25415638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical trial of 2 highly sensitive pregnancy tests--Tandem ICON HCG-urine and OPCO One-step Pacific Biotech].
    Lauszus FF
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Jul; 154(30):2069-70. PubMed ID: 1509578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of low urine specific gravity on pregnancy testing.
    Neinstein L; Harvey F
    J Am Coll Health; 1998 Nov; 47(3):138-9. PubMed ID: 9830821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reviewing the gravitest].
    Polikhronova L
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1976; 15(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 998935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False-positive results in home ovulation prediction devices due to very low concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin.
    Crews BO; Moley KH; Gronowski AM
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Oct; 46(15):1625. PubMed ID: 23899580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) testing--part I.
    Diwan CA
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Feb; 43(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 21388026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Possibilities and limitations of immunological pregnancy tests].
    Echtermeyer H; Macheleidt R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1968 Apr; 90(15):517-23. PubMed ID: 5662447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urine and serum pregnancy tests compared.
    Emancipator K
    Clin Chem; 1991 Feb; 37(2):302-3. PubMed ID: 1993349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new microhemagglutination inhibition pregnancy test.
    Petchclai B; Pongdherapol U
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Dec; 54(6):810-2. PubMed ID: 5484032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative evaluation of a new pregnancy test].
    Segré C; Vaiani R; Zappa N
    Minerva Ginecol; 1982 Sep; 34(9):715-9. PubMed ID: 7145211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experts weigh in on hCG testing.
    Levin L; Hopkins P; Tiffany D; Ballou L
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Feb; 43(2):22, 24. PubMed ID: 21388027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An unlikely pregnancy.
    Greene DN; Hall BJ; Grenache DG
    Clin Chem; 2010 Oct; 56(10):1645-6. PubMed ID: 20876781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Home testing for pregnancy].
    Shiba K
    Rinsho Byori; 2007 Jan; Suppl 138():145-50. PubMed ID: 17477141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Urinary Hcg determination by means of a new and more sensitive haemagglutination test (author's transl)].
    Spona J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1978 Sep; 90(18):666-70. PubMed ID: 695660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No advantages to recent tests for urinary human choriogonadotropin?
    Gloning KP; Dibbe HL; Kuss E
    Clin Chem; 1984 Oct; 30(10):1715-6. PubMed ID: 6478607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The newer pregnancy tests.
    Plano VF
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1977 Oct; 77(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 556467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of sensitivity and specificity of beta monoclonal agglutination inhibition and sandwich immunometric assay tests in the diagnosis of pregnancy.
    Khan AS; Khan AR; Khan H
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1989 May; 39(5):131-3. PubMed ID: 2504949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of an automated database to evaluate markers for early detection of pregnancy.
    Manson JM; McFarland B; Weiss S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 154(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 11447053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.