These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12520224)
21. The length of time necessary to break even after converting to digital mammography. Hiatt MD; Carr JJ; Manning RL J Telemed Telecare; 2000; 6(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 11027123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Camtronics experience with the filmless digital catheterization laboratory. Kapp MA; Vaughn ST Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 10453388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once. Fang YC; Yang MC; Hsueh YS J Digit Imaging; 2006; 19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16763930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Introduction of an ultrasound picture archiving and communication system: experience in the first year. Hanbidge A; McCallum C; Wilson SR Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Jun; 48(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 9193414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Determining the total cost of ownership of CCD and laser scanners. Cannavo MJ Telemed Today; 1999 Apr; 7(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 10557533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting. Ciatto S; Brancato B; Baglioni R; Turci M Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 16183238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. Arenson RL; Andriole KP; Avrin DE; Gould RG J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preliminary impacts of PACS technology on radiology department operations. Siegel E; Brown A Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():917-21. PubMed ID: 7950057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Filmless automation: from vision to reality. Reicher MA Adm Radiol; 1995 Jun; 14(6):24-5, 32-5. PubMed ID: 10155041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation. Reiner B; Siegel E; Bradham D; Saunders H; Johnson B J Digit Imaging; 2000 Aug; 13(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 15359752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. Strickland NH Br J Radiol; 1996 Dec; 69(828):1089-98. PubMed ID: 9135462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Planning and cost analysis of digital radiography services for a network of hospitals (the Veterans Integrated Service Network). Duerinckx AJ; Kenagy JJ; Grant EG J Telemed Telecare; 1998; 4(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 10321046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. It's not the principle of the thing. Rogers LJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):933. PubMed ID: 9334134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Branching out with filmless radiology. Carbajal R; Honea R J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):134-6. PubMed ID: 10342191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]