These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12520240)
21. Vesselness-constrained robust PCA for vessel enhancement in x-ray coronary angiograms. Zhang J; Wang G; Xie H; Zhang S; Shi Z; Gu L Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(15):155019. PubMed ID: 29923833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of vessel contrast measured with a scanning-beam digital x-ray system and an image intensifier/television system. Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 11243348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Variations in measured vessel diameters using coronary measurement system. Robert N; Yaffe MJ; Langer A Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 8922311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advantages and limitations of two software calipers in quantitative coronary arteriography. Koning G; Reiber JH; von Land CD; Loois G; van Meurs B Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 1753156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Statistical considerations on the precision of assessing blood vessel diameter in cine coronary angiography. Sandor T; Spears JR Comput Biomed Res; 1985 Dec; 18(6):531-43. PubMed ID: 4075787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of a dynamic blood vessel phantom for evaluation of moving images. Osawa M; Kondo K; Hisaya S; Kato K J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):193-203. PubMed ID: 31778015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system. Tomkowiak MT; Speidel MA; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):283-93. PubMed ID: 21361197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is coronary stent assessment improved with spectral analysis of dual energy CT? Halpern EJ; Halpern DJ; Yanof JH; Amin-Spector S; Fischman D; Aviram G; Sosna J Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19523853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS. Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose-wise scanning in visceral computed tomography angiography: a phantom study. Werncke T; von Falck C; Taupitz M; Hoeschen C; Wacker F; Meyer BC Invest Radiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):530-7. PubMed ID: 22864377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]