311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12520373)
1. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
Burger J
Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site.
Burger J; Mayer HJ; Greenberg M; Powers CW; Volz CD; Gochfeld M
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jul; 69(13):1217-38. PubMed ID: 16754537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Human ecology and interdisciplinary cooperation for primary prevention of environmental risk factors for public health].
Dobrowolski JW
Przegl Lek; 2007; 64 Suppl 4():35-41. PubMed ID: 18540323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of monitored natural recovery in sediment remediation.
Magar VS; Wenning RJ
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 16640320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term stewardship of the environmental legacy at restored sites within the Department of Energy nuclear weapons complex.
Wells JR; Spitz HB
Health Phys; 2003 Nov; 85(5):578-84. PubMed ID: 14571990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-activity radioactive materials management at the U.S. Department of Energy.
Marcinowski F; Tonkay DW
Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 17033462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: consistency despite demographic and geographical differences.
Burger J
Environ Res; 2004 Jun; 95(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 15147927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collaboration and importance of federally sponsored Superfund research programs.
Spengler RF; Anderson BE; Zenick H
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 12018001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
