These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12520373)

  • 1. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
    Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
    Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
    Burger J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
    Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site.
    Burger J; Mayer HJ; Greenberg M; Powers CW; Volz CD; Gochfeld M
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jul; 69(13):1217-38. PubMed ID: 16754537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
    Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk perception, future land use and stewardship: comparison of attitudes about Hanford Site and Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory.
    Burger J; Sanchez J; Roush D; Gochfeld M
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Apr; 61(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 11383101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
    Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Human ecology and interdisciplinary cooperation for primary prevention of environmental risk factors for public health].
    Dobrowolski JW
    Przegl Lek; 2007; 64 Suppl 4():35-41. PubMed ID: 18540323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of monitored natural recovery in sediment remediation.
    Magar VS; Wenning RJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 16640320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term stewardship of the environmental legacy at restored sites within the Department of Energy nuclear weapons complex.
    Wells JR; Spitz HB
    Health Phys; 2003 Nov; 85(5):578-84. PubMed ID: 14571990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-activity radioactive materials management at the U.S. Department of Energy.
    Marcinowski F; Tonkay DW
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 17033462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
    Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: consistency despite demographic and geographical differences.
    Burger J
    Environ Res; 2004 Jun; 95(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 15147927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaboration and importance of federally sponsored Superfund research programs.
    Spengler RF; Anderson BE; Zenick H
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 12018001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.