BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12520373)

  • 21. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper.
    Leo P; Eijsackers HJ; Koelmans AA; Vijver MG
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Dec; 406(3):503-17. PubMed ID: 18757078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Logic and motivation in risk research: a nuclear waste test case.
    Brown RV
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):125-40. PubMed ID: 15787762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Environment. Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites.
    Whicker FW; Hinton TG; MacDonell MM; Pinder JE; Habegger LJ
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1615-6. PubMed ID: 15016982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program.
    Charnley S; Engelbert B
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Nov; 77(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 16112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury J; Jeitner C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):181. PubMed ID: 32065319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction.
    Carpenter AC; Gardner KH; Fopiano J; Benson CH; Edil TB
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(10):1458-64. PubMed ID: 17499986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Policy characterization of ecosystem management.
    Lamont A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):5-18. PubMed ID: 16502036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. U.S. Department of Energy policies, directives, and guidance for radiological control and release of property.
    Wallo A; Domotor S; Vázquez G
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):526-8. PubMed ID: 17033468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach.
    Apitz SE; Elliott M; Fountain M; Galloway TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16640322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Public and occupational risks of the Nevada (USA) Test Site.
    Inhaber H
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):505-17. PubMed ID: 11494069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Bliss LS; Bunn A; Clarke JH; Mayer HJ; Salisbury JA
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1054-1064. PubMed ID: 30308877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites.
    Arvai J; Gregory R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 37(8):1469-76. PubMed ID: 12731826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stewardship and future land use at a Department of Energy site: does self-interest determine ratings?
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2001 Jul; 63(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 11471868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment methods for concerns about contaminated sites.
    Burger J
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Jan; 67(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 14668110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Applicability of risk-based management and the need for risk-based economic decision analysis at hazardous waste contaminated sites.
    Khadam I; Kaluarachchi JJ
    Environ Int; 2003 Jul; 29(4):503-19. PubMed ID: 12705948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A proliferation of nuclear waste for the Southeast.
    Alvarez R; Smith S
    J S C Med Assoc; 2007 Dec; 103(9):259-62. PubMed ID: 18284081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.