These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12521343)

  • 1. Critique of a computer model study of AC defibrillation.
    Knisley SB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Dec; 13(12):1262-3. PubMed ID: 12521343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Termination of reentry by a long-lasting AC shock in a slice of canine heart: a computational study.
    Meunier JM; Eason JC; Trayanova NA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Dec; 13(12):1253-61. PubMed ID: 12521342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biophysical model for defibrillation of cardiac tissue.
    Keener JP; Panfilov AV
    Biophys J; 1996 Sep; 71(3):1335-45. PubMed ID: 8874007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alteration of defibrillation threshold by antiarrhythmic drugs: a theoretical framework.
    Babbs CF
    Crit Care Med; 1981 May; 9(5):362-3. PubMed ID: 7214953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of anisotropic myocardial conductivity in model of defibrillation current density distribution.
    Malik M; Smits KF; Lindemans FW
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1994 Jul; 32(4 Suppl):S34-40. PubMed ID: 7967837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The shape of high-voltage impulse and the effect of defibrillation].
    Moroz VV; Bogushevich MS; Vostrikov VA; Kozlova EK; Chernysh AM
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2002; (6):60-3. PubMed ID: 12611162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two biophysical mechanisms of defibrillation of cardiac tissue.
    Pumir A; Krinsky VI
    J Theor Biol; 1997 Mar; 185(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 9135801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane polarization induced in the myocardium by defibrillation fields: an idealized 3-D finite element bidomain/monodomain torso model.
    Huang Q; Eason JC; Claydon FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Jan; 46(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 9919823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inclusion of junction elements in a linear cardiac model through secondary sources: application to defibrillation.
    Plonsey R; Barr RC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1986 Mar; 24(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3713274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
    Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biphasic mystery: why a biphasic shock is more effective than a monophasic shock for defibrillation.
    Keener JP; Lewis TJ
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Sep; 200(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10479536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Animated images of cardiac membrane voltage during defibrillation.
    Pruente HM; Bove R; Kwaku KF; Dillon SM
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():7-15. PubMed ID: 8656132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refractoriness prolongation by defibrillation shocks.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA
    Circulation; 1990 Sep; 82(3):1064-6. PubMed ID: 2393994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Various ways to make phase singularities by electric shock.
    Winfree AT
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 11(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 10749351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making sense of a heart gone wild.
    Mackenzie D
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):786-7. PubMed ID: 14764864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximate solution to the bidomain equations for defibrillation problems.
    Patel SG; Roth BJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Feb; 71(2 Pt 1):021908. PubMed ID: 15783353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic defibrillation waveforms in an isolated rabbit heart preparation.
    Holley LK; McCulloch RM
    Cardiovasc Res; 1991 Dec; 25(12):979-83. PubMed ID: 1806236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Passive propagation of the transmembrane potential induced by the capacities of the myocardium bioelectrolytes in its electric defibrillation].
    Rybkin SN; Selishchev SV
    Med Tekh; 2004; (3):12-8. PubMed ID: 15293496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A conceptual basis for defibrillation waveforms.
    Cleland BG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Aug; 19(8):1186-95. PubMed ID: 8865216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Yamanouchi Y; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 10969748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.