105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12521425)
21. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A review of smoking cessation services in women attending colposcopy clinics in Scotland.
Rumbles AU; Nicholson SC; Court SJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Feb; 32(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 22296432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Who defaults from colposcopy? A multi-centre, population-based, prospective cohort study of predictors of non-attendance for follow-up among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology.
Sharp L; Cotton S; Thornton A; Gray N; Cruickshank M; Whynes D; Duncan I; Hammond R; Smart L; Little J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 22921577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003.
Lindberg LD; Frost JJ; Sten C; Dailard C
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2006 Sep; 38(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 16963387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Knowledge of the cervical cancer screening process among rural and urban illinois women undergoing colposcopy.
Massad LS; Verhulst SJ; Hagemeyer M; Brady P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 17012992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characteristics of women refusing follow-up for tests or symptoms suggestive of breast cancer.
Weinmann S; Taplin SH; Gilbert J; Beverly RK; Geiger AM; Yood MU; Mouchawar J; Manos MM; Zapka JG; Westbrook E; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):33-8. PubMed ID: 16287883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Communicating colposcopy results: what do patients and providers discuss?
Pruitt SL; Parker PA; Follen M; Basen-Engquist K
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 18369302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Women's experiences of repeated HPV testing in the context of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study.
Waller J; McCaffery K; Kitchener H; Nazroo J; Wardle J
Psychooncology; 2007 Mar; 16(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 16858719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of follow-up for low-grade cytological abnormalities in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2000-2005.
Benard VB; Howe W; Saraiya M; Helsel W; Lawson HW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 18820545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What predicts adherence to follow-up recommendations for abnormal Pap tests among older women?
Coker AL; Eggleston KS; Meyer TE; Luchok K; Das IP
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17157363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Context of care and contraceptive method use.
Boardman LA; Weitzen S; Lapane KL
Womens Health Issues; 2004; 14(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15120414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Which demographic factors influence Pacific women's attendance at colposcopy clinics in New Zealand?
McPherson G; Parmar P; Payne D; Fairbairn-Dunlop TP
N Z Med J; 2021 Oct; 134(1543):69-78. PubMed ID: 34695078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women.
Amarin ZO; Badria LF; Obeidat BR
East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 18561732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Addressing Taiwan's high incidence of cervical cancer: factors associated with the Nation's low compliance with Papanicolaou screening in Taiwan.
Liao CC; Wang HY; Lin RS; Hsieh CY; Sung FC
Public Health; 2006 Dec; 120(12):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17074376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Demographic, risk factor, and knowledge differences between Latinas and non-Latinas referred to colposcopy.
del Carmen MG; Findley M; Muzikansky A; Roche M; Verrill CL; Horowitz N; Seiden MV
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 16949138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
