These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1252192)

  • 1. Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation.
    Gelfand SA; Hochberg I
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 1252192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reverberation as a parameter in clinical testing.
    Nábĕlek AK; Robinette L
    Audiology; 1978; 17(3):239-59. PubMed ID: 666659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation method for hearing aid fitting under reverberation: comparison between monaural and binaural hearing aids.
    Shiraishi K; Inoue M; Yonemoto K; Imamura A
    J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci; 2004 Nov; 23(6):255-8. PubMed ID: 15599071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ear dominance for nonsense-syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing-impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Hattori H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 8219299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reverberation strength perceived by normal-hearing listeners predictable based on time-varying binaural loudness.
    Ellis GM; Zahorik P
    Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 409():108316. PubMed ID: 34340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.
    Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
    Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 1494281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetric hemodynamic responses of the human auditory cortex to monaural and binaural stimulation.
    Jäncke L; Wüstenberg T; Schulze K; Heinze HJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 170(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 12208550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation.
    Hawkins DB; Yacullo WS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 6748623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages.
    Nábĕlek AK; Robinson PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1242-8. PubMed ID: 7085996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children's perception of speech in reverberation.
    Neuman AC; Hochberg I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2145-9. PubMed ID: 6875100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural speech discrimination.
    van Zyl FJ; Brasier VJ
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 938346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.