These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12522346)

  • 1. [An absorbed dose conversion factor due to the x-ray spectrum compare with the method by the half-value layer].
    Tachibana M; Izumi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 58(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 12522346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measured X-ray Spectra and Absorbed Dose Conversion Factors in a Water Equivalent Phantom Irradiated with Diagnostic X-rays].
    Aoki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(10):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30344211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Absorbed dose conversion factors obtained from X-ray spectra measured at water phantom surface].
    Aoki K; Koyama M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Mar; 61(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 15815558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute x-ray dosimetry on a synchrotron medical beam line with a graphite calorimeter.
    Harty PD; Lye JE; Ramanathan G; Butler DJ; Hall CJ; Stevenson AW; Johnston PN
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052101. PubMed ID: 24784390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
    Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure-to-absorbed-dose conversion for human adult cortical bone.
    Schauer DA; Seltzer SM; Links JM
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1993 Mar; 44(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 8472022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problems of the effective energy used as a quality expression of diagnostic X-ray].
    Kato H; Hayashi N; Suzuki S; Ando S; Miyamoto M; Wakasugi N; Suzuki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 22026986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Development of computer code, SDEC, for evaluation of patient surface dose from diagnostic X-ray].
    Kato H; Fujii S; Yoshimi Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Oct; 65(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 19893265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A graphite calorimeter for absolute measurements of absorbed dose to water: application in medium-energy x-ray filtered beams.
    Pinto M; Pimpinella M; Quini M; D'Arienzo M; Astefanoaei I; Loreti S; Guerra AS
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(4):1738-64. PubMed ID: 26841127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Air kerma rate constants for gamma emitters used most often in practice.
    Ninkovic MM; Raicevic JJ; Adrovic F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):247-50. PubMed ID: 16381721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Ma CM; Seuntjens JP
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jan; 44(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 10071880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative response of the alanine dosimeter to medium energy x-rays.
    Anton M; Büermann L
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):6113-29. PubMed ID: 26216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of factors to convert absorbed dose calibrations from graphite to water for the NPL high-energy photon calibration service.
    Nutbrown RF; Duane S; Shipley DR; Thomas RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):441-54. PubMed ID: 11858210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fricke dosimetry: the difference between G(Fe3+) for 60Co gamma-rays and high-energy x-rays.
    Klassen NV; Shortt KR; Seuntjens J; Ross CK
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 44(7):1609-24. PubMed ID: 10442700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Difference in Backscatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays by the Difference in the Scattering Medium and in the Objective Dose].
    Kato H; Sakai K; Uchiyama M; Suzuki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(10):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 27760900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between X-rays spectra and their effective energies in small animal CT tomographic imaging and dosimetry.
    Hamdi M; Mimi M; Bentourkia M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 40(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 28005238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.