174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12522709)
1. Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.
Ferguson SJ; Winkler F; Nolte LP
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 12522709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines.
Paré PE; Chappuis JL; Rampersaud R; Agarwala AO; Perra JH; Erkan S; Wu C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(18):E1210-4. PubMed ID: 21325986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.
Choma TJ; Pfeiffer FM; Swope RW; Hirner JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1628-32. PubMed ID: 22996264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Li ZM; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 20087222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure.
Yüksel KZ; Adams MS; Chamberlain RH; Potocnjak M; Park SC; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17482111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine.
Reinhold M; Schmoelz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study.
Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Resch H; Stephan D; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Korn G; Kendell A; Meier O; Mayer M
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23415899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
