These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12523241)

  • 1. Shaping root canals, Part V: GT File technique in small-root canals.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2000 Jan; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 12523241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping root canals, Part 4. GT File technique in large root canals with large apical diameters.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Dec; 18(12):64-6, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10803154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping root canals, Part VI: GT File technique in abruptly curved canals.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2000 Feb; 19(2):66-71, 166. PubMed ID: 15027289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shaping root canals, Part 3. Large-root canals with small coronal and apical diameters.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Nov; 18(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 10803164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. III. Study of the instruments from the viewpoint of shaping asymmetry].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Oct; 88(10):319-29. PubMed ID: 8521999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1998 May; 17(5):54-60. PubMed ID: 9796468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [In vitro comparison of instruments for root canal preparation. I. Pilot study of the homogeneity of study groups].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Jun; 88(6):199-204. PubMed ID: 8522015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative evaluation of root canal shaping instruments tested on extracted human teeth. I. Comparison of traditional manual instruments and the Kerr-flex filing device].
    Dobó NC; Kiss I; Bartha K; Bernåth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Jul; 88(7):225-32. PubMed ID: 8522017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [In vitro comparison of instruments used for root canal preparation. II. Effectiveness of the instruments].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1995 Aug; 88(8):261-9. PubMed ID: 8522021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the apical transportation of root canals using the method of the curvature radius.
    Lopes HP; Elias CN; Estrela C; Siqueira JF
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9835803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular canine with two separated canals.
    Ghoddusi J; Zarei M; Vatanpour M
    N Y State Dent J; 2007 Nov; 73(6):52-3. PubMed ID: 18265772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feel of steel, Part 2: Getting to the point.
    Rozen J
    Dent Today; 1998 Jun; 17(6):56-8, 60-1. PubMed ID: 9796451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Root canal preparation: shaping and cleaning of the root canal].
    Peters LB; Wesselink PR
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Nov; 112(11):436-40. PubMed ID: 16320567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Feb; 18(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 10765815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.