323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12524614)
1. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Muto T; Shigeo K; Yamamoto K; Kawakami J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 61(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 12524614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Tsuji Y; Muto T; Kawakami J; Takeda S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 34(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15741030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of ramus measurement through computed tomography in the sagittal split osteotomy of the ramus].
Ma J; Li BH; Lu L
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 24(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 19119634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of mandibular ramus morphology using computed tomography in patients with mandibular prognathism and retrognathia: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Noleto JW; Marchiori E; Da Silveira HM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20493618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle.
Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Kaneuji T; Nogami S; Yamamoto N; Miyamoto I; Yamashita Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 21549489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Fukai Y; Tokitsu T; Tomikawa M; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Morimoto Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3022-7. PubMed ID: 20739116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the mandibular ramus fracture line after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):e648-52. PubMed ID: 23078827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus at the lingual plane in patients with mandibular hyperplasia.
Ma J; Lu L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(8):823-6. PubMed ID: 19395237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback.
Proffit WR; Phillips C; Dann C; Turvey TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1940541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy used to correct Class III malocclusion: review of the literature.
Costa F; Robiony M; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomic study to determine a safe surgical reference point for mandibular ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Kim GJ; Park HS; Jung YS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23454267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism.
Kobayashi T; Watanabe I; Ueda K; Nakajima T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Sep; 44(9):693-7. PubMed ID: 3462361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation.
Chung IH; Yoo CK; Lee EK; Ihm JA; Park CJ; Lim JS; Hwang KG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 18280376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy) for open bite with skeletal class III deformity.
Kwon TG; Na K; Lee SH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24787080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the computed tomography (pixel) value of mandibular ramus bone and fixation screws after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1337-45. PubMed ID: 26139563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal and dental changes after orthognathic surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism.
Dogan S
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1997 Mar; 39(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9198332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
