630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12525232)
1. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Mahadevia PJ; Fleisher LA; Frick KD; Eng J; Goodman SN; Powe NR
JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 12525232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Das P; Ng AK; Earle CC; Mauch PM; Kuntz KM
Ann Oncol; 2006 May; 17(5):785-93. PubMed ID: 16500905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening: a microsimulation model.
Evans WK; Gauvreau CL; Flanagan WM; Memon S; Yong JHE; Goffin JR; Fitzgerald NR; Wolfson M; Miller AB
CMAJ Open; 2020; 8(3):E585-E592. PubMed ID: 32963023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
Lung Cancer; 2016 Nov; 101():98-103. PubMed ID: 27794416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States.
McMahon PM; Kong CY; Bouzan C; Weinstein MC; Cipriano LE; Tramontano AC; Johnson BE; Weeks JC; Gazelle GS
J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Nov; 6(11):1841-8. PubMed ID: 21892105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for proteinuria in US adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Boulware LE; Jaar BG; Tarver-Carr ME; Brancati FL; Powe NR
JAMA; 2003 Dec; 290(23):3101-14. PubMed ID: 14679273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of baseline low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the Israeli experience.
Shmueli A; Fraifeld S; Peretz T; Gutfeld O; Gips M; Sosna J; Shaham D
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):922-31. PubMed ID: 24041342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting.
Treskova M; Aumann I; Golpon H; Vogel-Claussen J; Welte T; Kuhlmann A
BMC Med; 2017 Aug; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 28838313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.
Jaine R; Kvizhinadze G; Nair N; Blakely T
Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():233-240. PubMed ID: 30268467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk-based lung cancer screening in heavy smokers: a benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modeling study.
Liu Y; Xu H; Lv L; Wang X; Kang R; Guo X; Wang H; Zheng L; Liu H; Guo L; Chen Q; Liu S; Qiao Y; Zhang S
BMC Med; 2024 Feb; 22(1):73. PubMed ID: 38369461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual screening for malignant melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Losina E; Walensky RP; Geller A; Beddingfield FC; Wolf LL; Gilchrest BA; Freedberg KA
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 17224538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kumar V; Cohen JT; van Klaveren D; Soeteman DI; Wong JB; Neumann PJ; Kent DM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 168(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 29297005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
