205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12525460)
1. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage.
Salim R; Regan L; Woelfer B; Backos M; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2003 Jan; 18(1):162-6. PubMed ID: 12525460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening.
Woelfer B; Salim R; Banerjee S; Elson J; Regan L; Jurkovic D
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 98(6):1099-103. PubMed ID: 11755560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study.
Prior M; Richardson A; Asif S; Polanski L; Parris-Larkin M; Chandler J; Fogg L; Jassal P; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 29055072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment.
Jayaprakasan K; Chan YY; Sur S; Deb S; Clewes JS; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 21337662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study.
Gergolet M; Campo R; Verdenik I; Kenda Suster N; Gordts S; Gianaroli L
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 22417666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography.
Jurkovic D; Geipel A; Gruboeck K; Jauniaux E; Natucci M; Campbell S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 5(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 7600203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Uterine anomalies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss].
Galamb Á; Pethő B; Fekete D; Petrányi G; Pajor A
Orv Hetil; 2015 Jul; 156(27):1081-4. PubMed ID: 26122902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.
Salim R; Woelfer B; Backos M; Regan L; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12808675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Salim R; Jurkovic D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 15123056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):800-814. PubMed ID: 30977223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.
Saravelos SH; Cocksedge KA; Li TC
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Mar; 20(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 20093084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Müllerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Suzumori N
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 25(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23812381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus?
Ludwin A; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Leitão VM; Acién M; Alcazar JL; Benacerraf B; Condous G; De Wilde RL; Emanuel MH; Gibbons W; Guerriero S; Hurd WW; Levine D; Lindheim S; Pellicer A; Petraglia F; Saridogan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 29024135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of glycodelin concentrations in uterine flushings in women with subseptate uteri, history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage and healthy controls.
Salim R; Miel J; Savvas M; Lee C; Jurkovic D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 17049713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prior birth and miscarriage frequency on the prevalence of acquired and congenital uterine anomalies in women with recurrent miscarriage: a cross-sectional study.
Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1916-22.e1. PubMed ID: 23472945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice.
Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population.
Dreisler E; Stampe Sørensen S
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):525-9. PubMed ID: 24875399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midline uterine defect size is correlated with miscarriage of euploid embryos in recurrent cases.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Kitaori T; Kumagai K; Suzuki S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1983-8. PubMed ID: 19249757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Katano K; Suzumori N; Mizutani E
Semin Reprod Med; 2011 Nov; 29(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 22161464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.
Chan YY; Jayaprakasan K; Tan A; Thornton JG; Coomarasamy A; Raine-Fenning NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 21830244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
