205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12525460)
21. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies.
Jurkovic D; Gruboeck K; Tailor A; Nicolaides KH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1320-1. PubMed ID: 9386036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uterine factor in recurrent pregnancy loss.
Turocy JM; Rackow BW
Semin Perinatol; 2019 Mar; 43(2):74-79. PubMed ID: 30683511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 25534461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uterine factors in recurrent pregnancy losses.
Carbonnel M; Pirtea P; de Ziegler D; Ayoubi JM
Fertil Steril; 2021 Mar; 115(3):538-545. PubMed ID: 33712099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of hysteroscopic role in management of women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Elsokkary M; Elshourbagy M; Labib K; Mamdouh A; El-Shahawy Y; Nossair WS; Abd El Fattah O; Hemeda H; Sallam S; Khalaf WM; Ali M; Elsayed M; Kotb A; Abdelhadi R; Etman M; Abd El Aleem M; Samy M; Salama A; Abdelhaleem M; Abdelshafy A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jun; 31(11):1494-1504. PubMed ID: 28412850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies.
Ghi T; Casadio P; Kuleva M; Perrone AM; Savelli L; Giunchi S; Meriggiola MC; Gubbini G; Pilu G; Pelusi C; Pelusi G
Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):808-13. PubMed ID: 18692833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for reproductive outcome.
Kupesic S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 18(4):387-400. PubMed ID: 11779002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal.
Saravelos SH; Cocksedge KA; Li TC
Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(5):415-29. PubMed ID: 18539641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review.
Chan YY; Jayaprakasan K; Zamora J; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning N; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 21705770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does surgery improve live birth rates in patients with recurrent miscarriage caused by uterine anomalies?
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Lin BL; Aoki K; Maruyama T; Nakatsuka M; Ozawa N; Sugi T; Takeshita T; Nishida M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 25058627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Congenital uterine anomalies affecting reproduction.
Reichman DE; Laufer MR
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 19897423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage.
Saravelos SH; Yan J; Rehmani H; Li TC
Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3274-9. PubMed ID: 21954281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of three-dimensional ultrasound in identifying Mullerian anomalies at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Negm SM; Kamel RA; El-Zayat HA; Elbigawy AF; El-Toukhy MM; Amin AH; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(16):3201-3208. PubMed ID: 32873098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Kougioumtsidou A; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Karavida A; Theodoridis TD; Sotiriadis A; Tarlatzis BC; Athanasiadis AP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 30661094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications.
Maneschi F; Zupi E; Marconi D; Valli E; Romanini C; Mancuso S
J Reprod Med; 1995 Oct; 40(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 8551467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of T-shaped uterus is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.
Neal SA; Morin SJ; Werner MD; Gueye NA; Pirtea P; Scott RT; Goodman LR
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Nov; 39(5):777-783. PubMed ID: 31563452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 62 November 2019.
Akhtar MA; Saravelos SH; Li TC; Jayaprakasan K;
BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 31749334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New outpatient subclassification system for American Fertility Society Classes V and VI uterine anomalies.
Gubbini G; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nascetti D; Marra E; Spinelli M; Greco E; Casadio P; Nappi C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 19835797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies.
Lin PC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15006276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Propst AM; Hill JA
Semin Reprod Med; 2000; 18(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 11355792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
