These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12525975)

  • 1. [Management of dose and quality in digital radiography].
    Busch HP
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 12525975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tradeoffs between image quality and dose.
    Seibert JA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S183-95; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
    Neitzel U
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S227-33; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimisation of imaging technique used in direct digital radiography.
    Roberts JA; Evans SC; Rees M
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 16926471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Willis CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):1-3; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 17410404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
    Norrman E; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A quantitative parameter for the objective comparison of the quality of the X-ray image visualization digital systems].
    Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):6-9. PubMed ID: 14603841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.