These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12527096)

  • 1. An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers.
    Sanders LD; Neville HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 15(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 12527096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers.
    Sanders LD; Neville HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 15(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 12527097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers: the use of lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues.
    Sanders LD; Neville HJ; Woldorff MG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 12069004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing.
    Mueller JL; Girgsdies S; Friederici AD
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 443(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 18674588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verbing nouns and nouning verbs: Using a balanced design provides ERP evidence against "syntax-first" approaches to sentence processing.
    Fromont LA; Steinhauer K; Royle P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229169. PubMed ID: 32168357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs.
    Mueller JL; Hahne A; Fujii Y; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1229-44. PubMed ID: 16197680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERPs show that classroom-instructed late second language learners rely on the same prosodic cues in syntactic parsing as native speakers.
    Nickels S; Opitz B; Steinhauer K
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Dec; 557 Pt B():107-11. PubMed ID: 24141083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.
    Yamada Y; Neville HJ
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):167-80. PubMed ID: 17173867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of non-native language exposure on the semantic processing of native language in preschool children.
    Takahashi J; Suzuki Y; Shibata H; Fukumitsu Y; Gyoba J; Hagiwara H; Koizumi M
    Neurosci Res; 2011 Mar; 69(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21147178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hahne A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 May; 30(3):251-66. PubMed ID: 11523274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
    Zachau S; Korpilahti P; Hämäläinen JA; Ervast L; Heinänen K; Suominen K; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():57-73. PubMed ID: 24751994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations.
    Friederici AD; Pfeifer E; Hahne A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1993 Oct; 1(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 8257874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners.
    Mueller JL; Hirotani M; Friederici AD
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 8():18. PubMed ID: 17331265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.
    Hahne A; Jescheniak JD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 11275482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
    Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials.
    Pakulak E; Neville HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2728-44. PubMed ID: 19925188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.