BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12527139)

  • 1. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Nourski KV; Hu N; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12527139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Rubinstein JT; Matsuoka AJ
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):197-218. PubMed ID: 10320109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    van den Honert C; Stypulkowski PH
    Hear Res; 1987; 29(2-3):195-206. PubMed ID: 3624083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirically based model of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):1-18. PubMed ID: 10491949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Zhang F; Jeng FC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 19205803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Robinson BK; Matsuoka AJ; Woodworth G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 9641327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
    DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli.
    Miller CA; Robinson BK; Rubinstein JT; Abbas PJ; Runge-Samuelson CL
    Hear Res; 2001 Jan; 151(1-2):79-94. PubMed ID: 11124454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Sep; 2(3):216-32. PubMed ID: 11669395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation.
    Mino H; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Abbas PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 14723489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation.
    Konerding WS; Baumhoff P; Kral A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 24(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 36459250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.