These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12527859)

  • 1. [Evaluation of imaging properties of recent screen-film systems].
    Yoshida A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Feb; 58(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 12527859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
    Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems.
    de Almeida A; Sobol WT; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 10360527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New X-ray film/screen system promises higher resolution.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Dec; 21(49):4. PubMed ID: 10115021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of screen-film performance tests--developing standards.
    Sluming V
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 70():233-4. PubMed ID: 9166044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control of X-ray screen-film sets in light of introduction of an international system of standards].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):16-8. PubMed ID: 12512276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the relative sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation.
    Yip KL; Whiting BR; Kocher TE; Trauernicht DP; Van Metter RL
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1727-37. PubMed ID: 8946369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro study comparing two different film-screen combinations in the detection of impacted fish bones.
    Abdullah BJ; Kaur H; Ng KH
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):930-3. PubMed ID: 10195007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
    Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A constancy test for quality assurance of x-ray film including film processing].
    Eder H; Schöfer H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1985 Jan; 38(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 3975787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An interlaboratory measurement of screen-film speed and average gradient according to ISO 9236-1.
    Buhr E; Bergmann D; Hoeschen D; Ailliet M; Sirand-Rey G; Gazzola C; Uras S
    Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 10718133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short communication: portal imaging with film-cassette combinations: what film should we use?
    Roberts R
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):70-1. PubMed ID: 8785625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. X-ray film duplicators. ECRI.
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Apr; 12(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 10134613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Developing of dental radiographic film: criteria for density evaluation].
    Moreira A
    Dens (Curitiba); 1987; 3(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 3509548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.