These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12528414)

  • 1. The impact of the new civil practice rules on clinical negligence claims.
    Brahams D
    Med Leg J; 1999; 67(Pt 1):7-8. PubMed ID: 12528414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Friend of the court.
    Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tort claims against health care providers for breach of confidentiality.
    Lawson CM
    Nebr Med J; 1989 Jun; 74(6):150-7. PubMed ID: 2755534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Not Available].
    Ambrosy H
    Kinderkrankenschwester; 2016 Aug; 33(10):377-380. PubMed ID: 30549520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The state of forensic medical expertise of civil cases concerning medical disputes].
    Barinov EKh; Romodanovskiĭ PO
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 25474920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ex parte discussions between treating physicians and defense counsel in malpractice and personal injury suits.
    Sapp SK
    Nebr Med J; 1989 Jun; 74(6):145-9. PubMed ID: 2755533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):3. PubMed ID: 15038329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the civil procedure rules on clinical negligence claims.
    Mayberry MK
    Postgrad Med J; 2003 Feb; 79(928):74-7. PubMed ID: 12612319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Expert judicial opinions in questions of liability].
    Quenu L
    Chirurgie; 1980; 106(7):555-6. PubMed ID: 7438880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicine 100 years ago. II. The doctor and the law.
    King LS
    JAMA; 1987 Apr; 257(16):2204. PubMed ID: 3550166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reported malpractice after postoperative infection of the locomotor system. Analysis of 261 expert testimony evaluations].
    St Arens ; Müller L; Hansis M
    Chirurg; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1263-9. PubMed ID: 9864640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert or fact witness: is there a legal obligation to testify?
    West RW; Sipe CY
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):906-7. PubMed ID: 17411731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies.
    McAbee GN
    Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):337; author reply 337. PubMed ID: 16043821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Estimation of medical protocol correctness in the light of opinions issued as ordered by the judiciary or prosecution authorities].
    Pieśniak D; Jankowski Z; Raszeja S
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Jul; 23(133):47-51. PubMed ID: 18051829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomy of a dental malpractice case: subpoenas and confidentiality.
    Plunkett LR
    N Y State Dent J; 1997 Feb; 63(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 9090254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Civil and legal responsibility of the expert witness].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Chirurg; 2000 Nov; 71(11):suppl 299-302. PubMed ID: 11132336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Discussed with a current case: physician confidentiality issue in conflict].
    Paukstadt W
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000; 142(3 Suppl):24-5. PubMed ID: 10893957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Amended judgment of malpractice due to delayed expert testimony. Decision by the German Federal Court 22 November 2005].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jun; 131(23):1339-40. PubMed ID: 16761205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expert testimony is not always necessary to prove professional negligence. Matheney v. Sharpe.
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2006; 26(4):35. PubMed ID: 19606769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Medical malpractice: civil rights problems].
    Schewe G; Janssen W
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1979; 37():91-104. PubMed ID: 518529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.