These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12528731)

  • 1. The extent of written trial information: preferences among potential and actual trial subjects.
    Madsen SM; Holm S; Riis P
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Jun; (159):13-8. PubMed ID: 12528731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How detailed information and how long consideration time do the potential trial subjects want?].
    Madsen SM; Holm S; Riis P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 May; 161(18):2661-6. PubMed ID: 10434786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants.
    Pope JE; Tingey DP; Arnold JM; Hong P; Ouimet JM; Krizova A
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):815-24. PubMed ID: 12672205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of detailed informed consent on research subjects' participation: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Marco CA
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Apr; 34(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 18022787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sharing clinical trial results with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.
    Donaldson S; Khetani N; Maniatis G; Stephens D; Wright JG
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19568019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who will consent to emergency treatment trials for subarachnoid hemorrhage?
    Del Giudice A; Plaum J; Maloney E; Kasner SE; Le Roux PD; Baren JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 19298620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Informed consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy. A patient-opinion survey].
    Denis B; Bottlaender J; Goineau J; Peter A; Weiss AM
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2002; 26(8-9):675-9. PubMed ID: 12434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of correlation between satisfaction and knowledge in clinical trials participants: a pilot study.
    Bertoli AM; Strusberg I; Fierro GA; Ramos M; Strusberg AM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Nov; 28(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 17581796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outpatients' knowledge about and attitude towards clinical research and randomized clinical trials. The INFO Trial Group.
    Kjaergaard LL; Kruse AY; Krogsgaard K; Gluud CN; Mortensen EL; Gottschau A; Bjerg AM
    Dan Med Bull; 1998 Sep; 45(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9777295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice.
    O'Dwyer HM; Lyon SM; Fotheringham T; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2003; 26(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 14753299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials.
    Fortun P; West J; Chalkley L; Shonde A; Hawkey C
    QJM; 2008 Aug; 101(8):625-9. PubMed ID: 18487271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate.
    Byrne CM; Harrison JD; Young JM; Selby WS; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1312-4. PubMed ID: 17998087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How preliminary data affect people's stated willingness to enter a hypothetical randomized controlled trial.
    Ubel PA; Merz JF; Shea J; Asch DA
    J Investig Med; 1997 Dec; 45(9):561-6. PubMed ID: 9444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening?
    Beardsley E; Jefford M; Mileshkin L
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Mar; 25(9):e13-4. PubMed ID: 17369564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomised trial of a computer-generated tailored written education package for patients following stroke.
    Hoffmann T; McKenna K; Worrall L; Read SJ
    Age Ageing; 2007 May; 36(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 17360794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the impact of a patient clinical trials handbook among pharmacy students.
    Graham AC; Raisch DW; Fye CL; Sather MR
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 15811487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinding protocols, treatment credibility, and expectancy: methodologic issues in clinical trials of osteopathic manipulative treatment.
    Licciardone JC; Russo DP
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):457-63. PubMed ID: 16943515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neonatal research: the parental perspective.
    Stenson BJ; Becher JC; McIntosh N
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jul; 89(4):F321-3. PubMed ID: 15210665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.
    Rahi JS; Manaras I; Tuomainen H; Hundt GL
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):e477-82. PubMed ID: 15466074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.