These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12529023)

  • 1. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12529023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?
    Mello-Thoms C; Dunn S; Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Sep; 9(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 12238541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
    Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Conant EF; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 17255410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of perceptual errors in reading mammograms using quasi-local spatial frequency spectra.
    Mello-Thoms C; Dunn SM; Nodine CF; Kundel HL
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 11720333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Feb; 3(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8796654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of breast cancers--a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers.
    Mello-Thoms C; Dunn SM; Nodine CF; Kundel HL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1297-306. PubMed ID: 14552583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The problem of image interpretation in mammography: effects of lesion conspicuity on the visual search strategy of radiologists.
    Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S111-6. PubMed ID: 17209115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual search in breast imaging.
    Gandomkar Z; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20190057. PubMed ID: 31287719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening.
    Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 18572124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
    Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
    Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How experience and training influence mammography expertise.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Orel SG; Sullivan DC; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Oct; 6(10):575-85. PubMed ID: 10516859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.
    Tourassi G; Voisin S; Paquit V; Krupinski E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 23788627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Feb; 95(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 12591984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.