These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1252926)

  • 1. Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits.
    Fouriezos G; Wise RA
    Brain Res; 1976 Feb; 103(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 1252926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuroleptic attenuation of intracranial self-stimulation: reward or performance deficits?
    Wise RA
    Life Sci; 1978 Feb; 22(7):535-42. PubMed ID: 342858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.
    Franklin KB; McCoy SN
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Jul; 11(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 493299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pimozide attenuates conditioned taste preferences induced by self-stimulation in rats.
    Ettenberg A; White N
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Dec; 15(6):915-9. PubMed ID: 7323117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-selective enhancement of locus coeruleus and substantia nigra self-stimulation after termination of chronic dopaminergic receptor blockade with pimozide in rats.
    Ettenberg A; Wise RA
    Psychopharmacol Commun; 1976; 2(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 981710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward in rats.
    Fouriezos G; Hansson P; Wise RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Aug; 92(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 29060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.
    Mekarski JE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 3252276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracranial self-stimulation in rats as a function of various stimulus parameters. II. Influence of haloperidol, pimozide and pipamperone on medial forebrain bundle stimulation with monopolar electrodes.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Psychopharmacologia; 1972; 27(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 4642460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure to obtain functional equivalence between dopamine receptor blockade and extinction: evidence supporting a sensory-motor conditioning hypothesis.
    Tombaugh TN; Szostak C; Voorneveld P; Tombaugh JW
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Jan; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 7058214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors.
    White N; Brown Z; Yachnin M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Nov; 9(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 733849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dopaminergic and noradrenergic inhibition of hypothalamic self-stimulation: differentiation of reward and performance effects.
    Sinden JD; Atrens DM
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1982 Dec; 86(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 7160436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-stimulation of the prefrontal cortex after microinjections of pimozide and GABA into the prefrontal cortex or ventrotegmental area in the rat.
    Sanguinetti AM; Vives F; Ferrer JM; Peinado JM; Montes R; Mora F
    Arch Farmacol Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 9(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 6673659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential effects of pimozide on response-rate and choice accuracy in a self-stimulation paradigm in mice.
    Bowers W; Hamilton M; Zacharko RM; Anisman H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Apr; 22(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 2859610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operant conditioning of hippocampal theta: dissociating reward from performance deficits.
    Fantie BD; Nakajima S
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Oct; 101(5):626-33. PubMed ID: 3675840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors.
    White N; Brown Z; Yachnin M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Sep; 9(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 714976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pimozide prevents the development of conditioned place preferences induced by rewarding locus coeruleus stimulation.
    Duvauchelle CL; MacConell LA; Eremia AD; Ettenberg A
    Behav Brain Res; 1992 Sep; 50(1-2):85-92. PubMed ID: 1449651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of pimozide on positive and negative incentive contrast with rewarding brain stimulation.
    Phillips AG; LePiane FG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Jun; 24(6):1577-82. PubMed ID: 3737627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pimozide on the improvement in learning produced by self-stimulation and by water reinforcement.
    White N; Major R
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 May; 8(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 674262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of dexetimide on pimozide-, haloperidol- and pipamperone-induced inhibition of brain self-stimulation in rats.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1975 Oct; 217(2):280-92. PubMed ID: 1190923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociation of the attentional and motivational effects of pimozide on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation.
    Bird M; Kornetsky C
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1990 Feb; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.