317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12529304)
1. Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes.
Pevzner P; Tesler G
Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12529304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages.
Bourque G; Zdobnov EM; Bork P; Pevzner PA; Tesler G
Genome Res; 2005 Jan; 15(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 15590940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes.
Bourque G; Pevzner PA; Tesler G
Genome Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 15059991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enrichment of segmental duplications in regions of breaks of synteny between the human and mouse genomes suggest their involvement in evolutionary rearrangements.
Armengol L; Pujana MA; Cheung J; Scherer SW; Estivill X
Hum Mol Genet; 2003 Sep; 12(17):2201-8. PubMed ID: 12915466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perfect sorting by reversals is not always difficult.
Bérard S; Bergeron A; Chauve C; Paul C
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 17277409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational tools for the analysis of rearrangements in mammalian genomes.
Tesler G; Bourque G
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 422():145-70. PubMed ID: 18629666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Murine segmental duplications are hot spots for chromosome and gene evolution.
Armengol L; Marquès-Bonet T; Cheung J; Khaja R; González JR; Scherer SW; Navarro A; Estivill X
Genomics; 2005 Dec; 86(6):692-700. PubMed ID: 16256303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species.
Bourque G; Pevzner PA
Genome Res; 2002 Jan; 12(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 11779828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chromosome evolution of MMU16 and RNO11: conserved synteny associated with gene order rearrangements explicable by intrachromosomal recombinations and neocentromere emergence.
Szpirer C; Rivière M; VanVooren P; Moisan MP; Haller O; Szpirer J
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2005; 108(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15627752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-break rearrangements and breakpoint re-uses: from circular to linear genomes.
Alekseyev MA
J Comput Biol; 2008 Oct; 15(8):1117-31. PubMed ID: 18788907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of mammalian ancestors using multispecies comparative maps.
Murphy WJ; Bourque G; Tesler G; Pevzner P; O'Brien SJ
Hum Genomics; 2003 Nov; 1(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 15601531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.
Kim J; Farré M; Auvil L; Capitanu B; Larkin DM; Ma J; Lewin HA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jul; 114(27):E5379-E5388. PubMed ID: 28630326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution.
Pevzner P; Tesler G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Jun; 100(13):7672-7. PubMed ID: 12810957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.
Kemkemer C; Kohn M; Cooper DN; Froenicke L; Högel J; Hameister H; Kehrer-Sawatzki H
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 9():84. PubMed ID: 19393055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution.
Bailey JA; Baertsch R; Kent WJ; Haussler D; Eichler EE
Genome Biol; 2004; 5(4):R23. PubMed ID: 15059256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rise and fall of breakpoint reuse depending on genome resolution.
Attie O; Darling AE; Yancopoulos S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S1. PubMed ID: 22151330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precise detection of rearrangement breakpoints in mammalian chromosomes.
Lemaitre C; Tannier E; Gautier C; Sagot MF
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 9():286. PubMed ID: 18564416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity analysis for reversal distance and breakpoint reuse in genome rearrangements.
Sinha AU; Meller J
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():37-48. PubMed ID: 18229675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational tools for the analysis of rearrangements in mammalian genomes.
Bourque G; Tesler G
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 452():431-55. PubMed ID: 18566776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colored de Bruijn graphs and the genome halving problem.
Alekseyev MA; Pevzner PA
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 17277417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
