BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12529305)

  • 1. Leveraging the mouse genome for gene prediction in human: from whole-genome shotgun reads to a global synteny map.
    Flicek P; Keibler E; Hu P; Korf I; Brent MR
    Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 12529305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using ESTs to improve the accuracy of de novo gene prediction.
    Wei C; Brent MR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():327. PubMed ID: 16817966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome.
    Mural RJ; Adams MD; Myers EW; Smith HO; Miklos GL; Wides R; Halpern A; Li PW; Sutton GG; Nadeau J; Salzberg SL; Holt RA; Kodira CD; Lu F; Chen L; Deng Z; Evangelista CC; Gan W; Heiman TJ; Li J; Li Z; Merkulov GV; Milshina NV; Naik AK; Qi R; Shue BC; Wang A; Wang J; Wang X; Yan X; Ye J; Yooseph S; Zhao Q; Zheng L; Zhu SC; Biddick K; Bolanos R; Delcher AL; Dew IM; Fasulo D; Flanigan MJ; Huson DH; Kravitz SA; Miller JR; Mobarry CM; Reinert K; Remington KA; Zhang Q; Zheng XH; Nusskern DR; Lai Z; Lei Y; Zhong W; Yao A; Guan P; Ji RR; Gu Z; Wang ZY; Zhong F; Xiao C; Chiang CC; Yandell M; Wortman JR; Amanatides PG; Hladun SL; Pratts EC; Johnson JE; Dodson KL; Woodford KJ; Evans CA; Gropman B; Rusch DB; Venter E; Wang M; Smith TJ; Houck JT; Tompkins DE; Haynes C; Jacob D; Chin SH; Allen DR; Dahlke CE; Sanders R; Li K; Liu X; Levitsky AA; Majoros WH; Chen Q; Xia AC; Lopez JR; Donnelly MT; Newman MH; Glodek A; Kraft CL; Nodell M; Ali F; An HJ; Baldwin-Pitts D; Beeson KY; Cai S; Carnes M; Carver A; Caulk PM; Center A; Chen YH; Cheng ML; Coyne MD; Crowder M; Danaher S; Davenport LB; Desilets R; Dietz SM; Doup L; Dullaghan P; Ferriera S; Fosler CR; Gire HC; Gluecksmann A; Gocayne JD; Gray J; Hart B; Haynes J; Hoover J; Howland T; Ibegwam C; Jalali M; Johns D; Kline L; Ma DS; MacCawley S; Magoon A; Mann F; May D; McIntosh TC; Mehta S; Moy L; Moy MC; Murphy BJ; Murphy SD; Nelson KA; Nuri Z; Parker KA; Prudhomme AC; Puri VN; Qureshi H; Raley JC; Reardon MS; Regier MA; Rogers YH; Romblad DL; Schutz J; Scott JL; Scott R; Sitter CD; Smallwood M; Sprague AC; Stewart E; Strong RV; Suh E; Sylvester K; Thomas R; Tint NN; Tsonis C; Wang G; Wang G; Williams MS; Williams SM; Windsor SM; Wolfe K; Wu MM; Zaveri J; Chaturvedi K; Gabrielian AE; Ke Z; Sun J; Subramanian G; Venter JC; Pfannkoch CM; Barnstead M; Stephenson LD
    Science; 2002 May; 296(5573):1661-71. PubMed ID: 12040188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational comparison of two mouse draft genomes and the human golden path.
    Xuan Z; Wang J; Zhang MQ
    Genome Biol; 2003; 4(1):R1. PubMed ID: 12537546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Analysis, identification and correction of some errors of model refseqs appeared in NCBI Human Gene Database by in silico cloning and experimental verification of novel human genes].
    Zhang DL; Ji L; Li YD
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 May; 31(5):431-43. PubMed ID: 15478601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated whole-genome multiple alignment of rat, mouse, and human.
    Brudno M; Poliakov A; Salamov A; Cooper GM; Sidow A; Rubin EM; Solovyev V; Batzoglou S; Dubchak I
    Genome Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):685-92. PubMed ID: 15060011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of rat genes by TWINSCAN gene prediction, RT-PCR, and direct sequencing.
    Wu JQ; Shteynberg D; Arumugam M; Gibbs RA; Brent MR
    Genome Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):665-71. PubMed ID: 15060008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse.
    Parra G; Agarwal P; Abril JF; Wiehe T; Fickett JW; Guigó R
    Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):108-17. PubMed ID: 12529313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes.
    Pevzner P; Tesler G
    Genome Res; 2003 Jan; 13(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12529304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate identification of novel human genes through simultaneous gene prediction in human, mouse, and rat.
    Dewey C; Wu JQ; Cawley S; Alexandersson M; Gibbs R; Pachter L
    Genome Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):661-4. PubMed ID: 15060007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction of a radiation hybrid map of chicken chromosome 2 and alignment to the chicken draft sequence.
    Leroux S; Dottax M; Bardes S; Vignoles F; Fève K; Pitel F; Morisson M; Vignal A
    BMC Genomics; 2005 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 15693999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene prediction using the Self-Organizing Map: automatic generation of multiple gene models.
    Mahony S; McInerney JO; Smith TJ; Golden A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Mar; 5():23. PubMed ID: 15070404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosome evolution of MMU16 and RNO11: conserved synteny associated with gene order rearrangements explicable by intrachromosomal recombinations and neocentromere emergence.
    Szpirer C; Rivière M; VanVooren P; Moisan MP; Haller O; Szpirer J
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2005; 108(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15627752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes.
    Bourque G; Pevzner PA; Tesler G
    Genome Res; 2004 Apr; 14(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 15059991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new strategy to identify novel genes and gene isoforms: Analysis of human chromosomes 15, 21 and 22.
    Rè M; Mignone F; Iacono M; Grillo G; Liuni S; Pesole G
    Gene; 2006 Jan; 365():35-40. PubMed ID: 16343814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction.
    Korf I; Flicek P; Duan D; Brent MR
    Bioinformatics; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():S140-8. PubMed ID: 11473003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using several pair-wise informant sequences for de novo prediction of alternatively spliced transcripts.
    Flicek P; Brent MR
    Genome Biol; 2006; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8.1-9. PubMed ID: 16925842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of segmental duplications and genome assembly in the mouse.
    Bailey JA; Church DM; Ventura M; Rocchi M; Eichler EE
    Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):789-801. PubMed ID: 15123579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using multiple alignments to improve gene prediction.
    Gross SS; Brent MR
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Mar; 13(2):379-93. PubMed ID: 16597247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Augmenting Chinese hamster genome assembly by identifying regions of high confidence.
    Vishwanathan N; Bandyopadhyay AA; Fu HY; Sharma M; Johnson KC; Mudge J; Ramaraj T; Onsongo G; Silverstein KA; Jacob NM; Le H; Karypis G; Hu WS
    Biotechnol J; 2016 Sep; 11(9):1151-7. PubMed ID: 27374913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.