135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12530359)
1. Portable ultrasound scanners. Shrinking size, growing market.
Health Devices; 2002 Aug; 31(8):279-94. PubMed ID: 12530359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Portable ultrasound scanners.
Health Devices; 2003 Aug; 32(8):285-320. PubMed ID: 14513789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GE healthcare Logiq i portable ultrasound scanner.
ECRI Institute
Health Devices; 2007 Apr; 36(4):124-35. PubMed ID: 17555166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Portable ultrasound scanners.
Health Devices; 2008 Aug; 37(8):221-45. PubMed ID: 19058439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [New methods of information technology for designing ultrasound diagnostic devices].
Trukhanov AI; Kudriavtsev PS
Med Tekh; 1994; (3):14-6. PubMed ID: 7934725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular ultrasonic scanners. ECRI.
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1992 Jul; 10(6):51-71. PubMed ID: 10119233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New ultrasound technologies promote better and faster diagnoses.
Freiherr G
Adm Radiol; 1993 Jul; 12(7):61, 63-4, 66-8. PubMed ID: 10128245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Duplex ultrasound scanners.
Health Devices; 1999 Apr; 28(4):124-63. PubMed ID: 10320952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Duplex ultrasound scanners: an evolving technology.
Health Devices; 1990 Nov; 19(11 Spec No):379-423. PubMed ID: 2258311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Autotransfusion units.
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1989; 7(6):58, 60, 62-7. PubMed ID: 10294434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Technology on wheels: evaluating the options.
Health Technol; 1987; 1(6):231-8. PubMed ID: 10285677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Buyers guide & market analysis. Mobile imaging.
Med Electron; 1988 Sep; 19(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 10288979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating image quality in high-res ultrasound.
Goldstein A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Dec; 13(12):89-100. PubMed ID: 10149751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Features to consider when selecting new ultrasound imaging systems.
Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jul; 8(7):521-3. PubMed ID: 21723494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Selecting the right ultrasound equipment--an administrator's perspective.
Jacoby R
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 12656055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to diagnose ultrasound transducer problems.
Phillips W
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 10360212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging systems. A guide to the technology.
Health Devices; 2005 Apr; 34(4):117-38. PubMed ID: 15945465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ultrasonography].
Coulon C
J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 81(7 Suppl):B32-5. PubMed ID: 10984859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sphygmomanometers: which to choose?
Fedder DO; Frohlich ED; Zweifler AJ
Patient Care; 1987 Apr; 21(8):67-76. PubMed ID: 10281922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A visual probe localization and calibration system for cost-effective computer-aided 3D ultrasound.
Ali A; Logeswaran R
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Aug; 37(8):1141-7. PubMed ID: 17126314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
