361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12530381)
1. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OPRR issues final findings in its investigation of university.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards and financial conflicts of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12374174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New human subject protection regulations are being delayed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15810181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
Saver RS
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board.
Huff TA
Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. University failed to have adequate IRB policies and procedures in place.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 12408153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
