These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12530384)
1. The future of mothering: reproductive technology and feminist theory. Donchin A Hypatia; 1986; 1(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 12530384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A feminist social justice approach to reproduction-assisting technologies: a case study on the limits of liberal theory. Callahan JC; Roberts DE KY Law J; 1996; 84(4):1197-234. PubMed ID: 15228041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the limits of freedom of contract: the commercialization of reproductive materials and services. Trebilcock M; Martin M; Lawson A; Lewis P Osgoode Hall Law J; 1994; 32(4):613-702. PubMed ID: 15846868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "O wind, remind him that I have no child": infertility and feminist jurisprudence. Lacey LJ Mich J Gend Law; 1998-1999; 5(1):163-203. PubMed ID: 16596756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The new reproductive technology: problem or solution? Strickler J Sociol Health Illn; 1992 Mar; 14(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 11652700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Feminist critiques of new fertility technologies: implications for social policy. Donchin A J Med Philos; 1996 Oct; 21(5):475-98. PubMed ID: 8943088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies. Curtis KF Polity; 1995; 28(2):159-87. PubMed ID: 11655203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Arendt and Heidegger to consider feminist thinking on women and reproductive/infertility technologies. Klawiter M Hypatia; 1990; 5(3):65-89. PubMed ID: 11657743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses. Young AH Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology. Parks J Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby M and the problem of unstable preferences. Seidman LM Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1829-36. PubMed ID: 11649253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproductive technology, Catholicism, feminism, and the thesis of bootstrap pessimism. Ellin J Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():37-49. PubMed ID: 12708419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour. Dickenson DL Bioethics; 2001 Jun; 15(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 11700675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: a feminist perspective. Rothman BK Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1599-607. PubMed ID: 11653382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Feminist attitudes and mother-daughter relationships in adolescence. Notar M; McDaniel SA Adolescence; 1986; 21(81):11-21. PubMed ID: 3728127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the use of IVF by post-menopausal women. Parks JA Hypatia; 1999; 14(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 11660700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]