These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1756 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12530702)

  • 1. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.
    Shrout PE; Bolger N
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Dec; 7(4):422-45. PubMed ID: 12530702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.
    Maxwell SE; Cole DA
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 17402810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects.
    Preacher KJ; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):93-115. PubMed ID: 21500915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations.
    Preacher KJ; Rucker DD; MacCallum RC; Nicewander WA
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 15998176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha.
    Rodriguez MC; Maeda Y
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):306-22. PubMed ID: 16953707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer).
    Bullock JG; Green DP; Ha SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Apr; 98(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 20307128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d.
    McGrath RE; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):386-401. PubMed ID: 17154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.
    Preacher KJ; Hayes AF
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):717-31. PubMed ID: 15641418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning.
    Steinberg L; Thissen D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 17154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT) to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables.
    Woods CM
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 16953704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.
    Muller D; Judd CM; Yzerbyt VY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):852-63. PubMed ID: 16393020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stability of nonlinear principal components analysis: an empirical study using the balanced bootstrap.
    Linting M; Meulman JJ; Groenen PJ; van der Kooij AJ
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Sep; 12(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 17784799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrapping to test for nonzero population correlation coefficients using univariate sampling.
    Beasley WH; DeShea L; Toothaker LE; Mendoza JL; Bard DE; Rodgers JL
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):414-433. PubMed ID: 18179352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of four procedures for detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items].
    Elosua P; López-Jáuregui A
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 17425906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: the need for a common procedure and validity data.
    Lambert MJ; Ogles BM
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):493-501. PubMed ID: 20183403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple effect size indicator for two-group comparisons? A comment on r equivalent.
    Kraemer HC
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16392996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: comment on Kareev (2000).
    Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):256-67; discussion 280-5. PubMed ID: 15631597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does vicarious traumatisation affect oncology nurses? A literature review.
    Sinclair HA; Hamill C
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Sep; 11(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 17482879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 88.