These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12530793)
1. The experience of using random digit dialling methods in a population-based chronic pain study. Blyth FM; March LM; Shellard D; Cousins MJ Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 12530793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths. Yang B; Eyeson-Annan M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():6. PubMed ID: 16504117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates. Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013. Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. Barr ML; van Ritten JJ; Steel DG; Thackway SV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():177. PubMed ID: 23173849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Differences between listed and unlisted telephone subscribers among telephone survey respondents]. Kigawa M; Nishikawa H Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Apr; 45(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 9691661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers? Dal Grande E; Taylor A; Wilson D Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Oct; 29(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 16255447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conducting Community Health Needs Assessments in the Local Public Health Department: A Comparison of Random Digit Dialing and the Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response. Stone K; Sierocki A; Shah V; Ylitalo KR; Horney JA J Public Health Manag Pract; 2018; 24(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 28141672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Random digit dialing in Chicago CARDIA: comparison of individuals with unlisted and listed telephone numbers. Orden SR; Dyer AR; Liu K; Perkins L; Ruth KJ; Burke G; Manolio TA Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Mar; 135(6):697-709. PubMed ID: 1580246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys. Donovan RJ; Holman CD; Corti B; Jalleh G Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9161067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chronic pain, work performance and litigation. Blyth FM; March LM; Nicholas MK; Cousins MJ Pain; 2003 May; 103(1-2):41-7. PubMed ID: 12749957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complementing random-digit-dial telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data. Galesic M; Tourangeau R; Couper MP Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 17046416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: challenges and practical solutions. McBride O; Morgan K; McGee H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22475155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic pain and frequent use of health care. Blyth FM; March LM; Brnabic AJ; Cousins MJ Pain; 2004 Sep; 111(1-2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15327808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Kempf AM; Remington PL Annu Rev Public Health; 2007; 28():113-26. PubMed ID: 17094769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study. Blyth FM; March LM; Brnabic AJ; Jorm LR; Williamson M; Cousins MJ Pain; 2001 Jan; 89(2-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 11166468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chapter V. A comparison of CATI and non-CATI questionnaires. Groves RM; Mathiowetz NA Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):33-9. PubMed ID: 15791754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Surveillance of risk factors for chronic diseases through telephone interviews]. Monteiro CA; de Moura EC; Jaime PC; Lucca A; Florindo AA; Figueiredo IC; Bernal R; da Silva NN Rev Saude Publica; 2005 Feb; 39(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 15654460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of random-digit-dial surveys for injury prevention and violence research. Link MW; Kresnow MJ Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 17046417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]