These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12532032)

  • 1. A proposed method for quantifying low-air-loss mattress performance by moisture transport.
    Figliola RS
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jan; 49(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 12532032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
    Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Egerton Convertible II and the Elite 3 bed system.
    Lowthian P
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Jan 25-Feb 7; 5(2):118, 120-3. PubMed ID: 8680245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-stage versus single-stage inflation and deflation cycle for alternating low pressure air mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients: a randomised-controlled clinical trial.
    Demarré L; Beeckman D; Vanderwee K; Defloor T; Grypdonck M; Verhaeghe S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2012 Apr; 49(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 22056165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative study of hydration level of the skin surface and erythema on conventional and microclimate management capable mattresses and hospital beds.
    Denzinger M; Krauss S; Held M; Joss L; Kolbenschlag J; Daigeler A; Rothenberger J
    J Tissue Viability; 2020 Feb; 29(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 31859129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Warner DJ
    Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):52-5, 58-60, 62-4. PubMed ID: 1596352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skin temperature and moisture management with a low air loss surface.
    Flam E; Isayeva E; Kipervas Y; Shklyarevsky V; Raab L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Oct; 41(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 7575985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation test for climate control on air-loss supports.
    Reger SI; Adams TC; Maklebust JA; Sahgal V
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 May; 82(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 11346834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for determining the heat transfer and water vapour permeability of patient support systems.
    Nicholson GP; Scales JT; Clark RP; de Calcina-Goff ML
    Med Eng Phys; 1999 Dec; 21(10):701-12. PubMed ID: 10717550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects.
    Chai CY; Bader DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():427-35. PubMed ID: 23791952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esprit HR mattress cover in pressure ulcer prevention.
    Khoulowa J
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Sep 13-26; 10(16):1073-4, 1076. PubMed ID: 11907458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
    Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
    Bain D
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Thermo contour mattress.
    Hampton S
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Aug 12-Sep 8; 8(15):990-6. PubMed ID: 10711028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of three types of alternating pressure air mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers in Belgian hospitals.
    Demarré L; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Grypdonck M; Clays E; Vanderwee K; Beeckman D
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 23907784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A combined experimental and computational approach to evaluate microclimate control at the support surface interface.
    Van Asten JGMV; Fung MT; Oomens CWJ; Bader DL; Worsley PR
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Aug; 30(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 34030943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality--can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?
    Niles DE; Maltese MR; Nishisaki A; Seacrist T; Leffelman J; Hutchins L; Schneck N; Sutton RM; Arbogast KB; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23395793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of an air mattress structure and function for reducing discomfort when elevating the head-of-bed.
    Ogawa Y; Mori T; Noguchi H; Nakagami G; Sanada H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Jan; 10(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24053189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical effectiveness of a low-tech versus high-tech pressure-redistributing mattress.
    Cavicchioli A; Carella G
    J Wound Care; 2007 Jul; 16(7):285-9. PubMed ID: 17708377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure signatures can influence tissue response for individuals supported on an alternating pressure mattress.
    Chai CY; Sadou O; Worsley PR; Bader DL
    J Tissue Viability; 2017 Aug; 26(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 28602246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.