BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12532059)

  • 1. Arch width after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    Gianelly AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12532059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction vs nonextraction orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Elias KG; Sivamurthy G; Bearn DR
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Jan; 94(1):83-106. PubMed ID: 37899069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of second premolar extractions on the volume of the oral cavity proper: a control comparative cone-beam computed tomography volumetric analysis study.
    Mladenovic M; Freezer S; Dreyer C; Meade MJ
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Jan; 94(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 38145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in buccal facial depth of female patients after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments: A preliminary study.
    Dai F; Yu J; Chen G; Xu T; Jiang R
    Korean J Orthod; 2018 May; 48(3):172-181. PubMed ID: 29732303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment.
    Hegde A; D L; M SA; Geevee A; Srikant RM
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57982. PubMed ID: 38738108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between arch width changes and long-term stability 20 years after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions.
    Perkovic V; Alexander M; Greer P; Kamenar E; Anic-Milosevic S
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Feb; 93(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 36744873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of Mandibular Arch Forms in Patients with Skeletal Mandibular Prognathism.
    Ichikawa E; Tachiki C; Nojima K; Matsunaga S; Sugahara K; Watanabe A; Kasahara N; Nishii Y
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37892057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between Intercanine Width and Mandibular Dental Arch Forms.
    Abdul Rehman S; Rizwan S; Faisal SS; Hussain SS
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-480. PubMed ID: 33866740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On dental arches of twins.
    Giri J; Hughes T; Bockmann M; Brook A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Oct; 164(4):459. PubMed ID: 37758394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.
    Paquette DE; Beattie JR; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1626523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
    Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics.
    Kim E; Gianelly AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 12940554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars.
    Johnson DK; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Aug; 108(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 7625391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of orthodontic premolar extraction on maxillary teeth angulation and arch dimensions in adolescent patients: A 3-D digital model analysis.
    Abohabib A; Viñas MJ; Ustrell JM
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e137-e144. PubMed ID: 38496807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of orthodontic-induced facial morphology changes on aesthetic evaluation: a retrospective study.
    Liu C; Du S; Wang Z; Guo S; Cui M; Zhai Q; Zhang M; Fang B
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 38183059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Full Diagnostic Process for the Orthodontic Treatment Strategy: A Documented Case Report.
    Lo Giudice A; Rustico L; Ronsivalle V; Spinuzza P; Polizzi A; Bellocchio AM; Scapellato S; Portelli M; Nucera R
    Dent J (Basel); 2020 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 32384632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics.
    Liu D; Li J; Lei F; Wang X; Zhou Y
    J Int Med Res; 2019 Jan; 47(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 30200801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical skeletal changes after extraction and non-extraction treatment in matched class I patients identified by a discriminant analysis: cephalometric appraisal and Procrustes superimposition.
    Beit P; Konstantonis D; Papagiannis A; Eliades T
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29250718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.