These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12532253)

  • 1. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
    Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel, portable, cassette-sized, and wireless flat-panel digital radiography system: initial workflow results versus computed radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Ackermann H; Schomerus C; Jacobi V; Balzer JO; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1368-71. PubMed ID: 21606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Workflow improvement and efficiency gain with near total digitalization of a radiology department].
    Langen HL; Bielmeier J; Wittenberg G; Selbach R; Feustel H
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 14556098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
    Sack D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital radiography. Cost-benefit analysis].
    Braunschweig R; Pistitsch C; Nissen-Meyer S
    Radiologe; 1996 Apr; 36(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 8677323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeat rates in digital chest radiography and strategies for improvement.
    Fintelmann F; Pulli B; Abedi-Tari F; Trombley M; Shore MT; Shepard JA; Rosenthal DI
    J Thorac Imaging; 2012 May; 27(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 22331101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CR/DR systems: what each technology offers today; what is expected for the future.
    Gallet J; Titus H
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(6):30-6. PubMed ID: 16475561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating digital systems: commitment and collaboration.
    Himes JA; Rosenfeld K
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 15259684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.
    Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann DL; Evens RG; Siegel MJ
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 7480702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.