These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12532886)

  • 1. [Long-term results of front teeth restoration using light-curing composite materials].
    Makeeva IM; Shelemet'eva GN; Turkina AIu
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2002; 81(5):41-4. PubMed ID: 12532886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer).
    Tyas MJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9573792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative dental bleaching: effect of microleakage on Class V tooth colored restorative materials.
    Owens BM; Rowland CC; Brown DM; Covington JS
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 78(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 10597150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid posterior composite restorations: a simplified procedure with anticariogenic properties.
    Porth RN
    Dent Today; 1996 Sep; 15(9):66-7. PubMed ID: 9567831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC; Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen FW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.
    Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen F; Burgersdijk RC; Peters TC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9823078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D; Bindi G; Krejci I; Davidson C
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compomers adaptation to Class I and V cavities in permanent teeth.
    el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):29-36, 8. PubMed ID: 10736655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keys to success in creating esthetic class IV restorations.
    Margeas RC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Feb; 22(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 20136949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.