165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12533581)
1. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects.
Michaeli DA; Inoue K; Hayes WC; Hipp JA
Skeletal Radiol; 1999 Feb; 28(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 10197454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study.
Lesh ML; Schneider DJ; Deol G; Davis B; Jacobs CR; Pellegrini VD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 10954098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geometric variables and bone mineral density as potential predictors for mechanical properties of the radius of Greyhounds.
Muir P; Markel MD
Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jul; 57(7):1094-7. PubMed ID: 8807027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell.
Augat P; Reeb H; Claes LE
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Sep; 11(9):1356-63. PubMed ID: 8864911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of bone architecture and biomechanic properties by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in rats].
Xing XP; Xia WB; Meng XW; Zhou XY; Hu YY; Liu HC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 May; 83(9):791-5. PubMed ID: 12899761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Zeller JB; Kaiser D; Eckstein F; Landgraf J; Putz R; Steldinger R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10326066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An early-life femoral shaft fracture and bone mineral density at adulthood.
Leppälä J; Kannus P; Niemi S; Sievänen H; Vuori I; Järvinen M
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 10692985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of bone size, not density, on the stiffness of the proximal part of normal and osteoporotic human femora.
Cordey J; Schneider M; Belendez C; Ziegler WJ; Rahn BA; Perren SM
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7 Suppl 2():S437-44. PubMed ID: 1485554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical strength of the proximal femur as predicted from geometric and densitometric bone properties at the lower limb versus the distal radius.
Lochmüller EM; Groll O; Kuhn V; Eckstein F
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):207-16. PubMed ID: 11792587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of bone mineral density and morphology determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography for cancellous bone strength of the proximal femur.
Wachter NJ; Augat P; Mentzel M; Sarkar MR; Krischak GD; Kinzl L; Claes LE
Bone; 2001 Jan; 28(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 11165955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone mineral and geometric changes through the femur with immobilization due to spinal cord injury.
Kiratli BJ; Smith AE; Nauenberg T; Kallfelz CF; Perkash I
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 10850829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled study of effects of sudden impact loading on rat femur.
Järvinen TL; Kannus P; Sievänen H; Jolma P; Heinonen A; Järvinen M
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1475-82. PubMed ID: 9738521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical bone thickness on preoperative CT scans as predictor of bone quality in distal femur fractures: a retrospective study in Caucasians.
Huppke CM; Fahlbusch H; Frosch KH; Krause M; von Rehlingen-Prinz F
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Feb; 144(2):731-740. PubMed ID: 38049535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur with morphologic data.
Hübsch P; Kocanda H; Youssefzadeh S; Schneider B; Kainberger F; Seidl G; Kurtaran A; Gruber S
Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 1389659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quantitative CT assessment of the proximal femur. Experimental studies on its correlation with breaking load in femoral neck fractures].
Buitrago-Téllez CH; Bonnaire F; Schulze C; Gufler H; Hönninger A; Kuner E; Langer M
Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 9465959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age and ovariectomy impair both the normalization of mechanical properties and the accretion of mineral by the fracture callus in rats.
Meyer RA; Tsahakis PJ; Martin DF; Banks DM; Harrow ME; Kiebzak GM
J Orthop Res; 2001 May; 19(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 11398856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
