These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12535974)

  • 1. Identifying potential marine pests--a deductive approach applied to Australia.
    Hayes KR; Sliwa C
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003 Jan; 46(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12535974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A risk-based predictive tool to prevent accidental introductions of nonindigenous marine species.
    Floerl O; Inglis GJ; Hayden BJ
    Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 35(6):765-78. PubMed ID: 15940401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geographic variation in marine invasions among large estuaries: effects of ships and time.
    Ruiz GM; Fofonoff PW; Ashton G; Minton MS; Miller AW
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Mar; 23(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 23634583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marine introduced species in Australia, where to from here? A personal perspective from a practising taxonomist.
    Hutchings P
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Nov; 136():477-480. PubMed ID: 30509832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marine introductions in the Southern Ocean: an unrecognised hazard to biodiversity.
    Lewis PN; Hewitt CL; Riddle M; McMinn A
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003 Feb; 46(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 12586117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How useful are port surveys focused on target pest identification for exotic species management?
    Bishop MJ; Hutchings PA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Jan; 62(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 20934194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marine biosecurity: the importance of awareness, support and cooperation in managing a successful incursion response.
    Piola RF; McDonald JI
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Sep; 64(9):1766-73. PubMed ID: 22748502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of multi-region input-output analysis to examine biosecurity risks associated with the global shipping network.
    Lenzen M; Tzeng M; Floerl O; Zaiko A
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 854():158758. PubMed ID: 36113796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-native marine bryozoans (Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata) in Brazilian waters: Assessment, dispersal and impacts.
    Miranda AA; Almeida ACS; Vieira LM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 May; 130():184-191. PubMed ID: 29866545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanisms for the prevention of marine bioinvasions for better biosecurity.
    Hewitt CL; Campbell ML
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007; 55(7-9):395-401. PubMed ID: 17379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What lies beneath? An evaluation of rapid assessment tools for management of hull fouling.
    Clarke Murray C; Therriault TW; Pakhomov E
    Environ Manage; 2013 Aug; 52(2):374-84. PubMed ID: 23716009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to setting organism-based ballast water discharge standards.
    Henry L; Reusser DA; Frazier M
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Mar; 23(2):301-10. PubMed ID: 23634582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recreational impacts on the fauna of Australian coastal marine ecosystems.
    Hardiman N; Burgin S
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 91(11):2096-108. PubMed ID: 20615603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal modelling of ballast water discharge and ship-mediated invasion risk to Australia.
    Cope RC; Prowse TA; Ross JV; Wittmann TA; Cassey P
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Apr; 2(4):150039. PubMed ID: 26064643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Panama Canal and the transoceanic dispersal of marine invertebrates: evaluation of the introduced amphipod Paracaprella pusilla Mayer, 1890 in the Pacific Ocean.
    Ros M; Ashton GV; Lacerda MB; Carlton JT; Vázquez-Luis M; Guerra-García JM; Ruiz GM
    Mar Environ Res; 2014 Aug; 99():204-11. PubMed ID: 25060067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying potential propagule pressure of aquatic invasive species from the commercial shipping industry in Canada.
    Lo VB; Levings CD; Chan KM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Feb; 64(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22206724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the Risk of Biological Invasions Using Environmental Similarity and Transport Network Connectedness.
    Cope RC; Ross JV; Wittmann TA; Watts MJ; Cassey P
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 28796311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the risk of ships striking large whales in marine spatial planning.
    Redfern JV; McKenna MF; Moore TJ; Calambokidis J; Deangelis ML; Becker EA; Barlow J; Forney KA; Fiedler PC; Chivers SJ
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 23521668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of containerships as transfer mechanisms of marine biofouling species.
    Davidson IC; Brown CW; Sytsma MD; Ruiz GM
    Biofouling; 2009 Oct; 25(7):645-55. PubMed ID: 20183123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A binational, supply-side evaluation for managing water quality and invasive fouling species on California's coastal boats.
    Johnson LT; Fernandez LM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Dec; 92(12):3071-81. PubMed ID: 21864973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.