These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Interocularly unpaired zones escape local binocular matching. Shimojo S; Nakayama K Vision Res; 1994 Jul; 34(14):1875-81. PubMed ID: 7941389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stability of binocular depth perception with moving head and eyes. van Ee R; Erkelens CJ Vision Res; 1996 Dec; 36(23):3827-42. PubMed ID: 8994584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Projected disparity, not horizontal disparity, predicts stereo depth of 1-D patterns. Farell B; Chai YC; Fernandez JM Vision Res; 2009 Aug; 49(17):2209-16. PubMed ID: 19540869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evidence for relative disparity matching in the perception of an ambiguous stereogram. Goutcher R; Hibbard PB J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):35. PubMed ID: 21047767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new look at binocular stereopsis. Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stereoscopic depth aftereffects without retinal position correspondence between adaptation and test stimuli. Taya S; Sato M; Nakamizo S Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1857-66. PubMed ID: 15797775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception. Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency. Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial properties of shear disparity processing. Kaneko H; Howard IP Vision Res; 1997 Feb; 37(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 9135865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant. Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A reevaluation of the tolerance to vertical misalignment in stereopsis. Fukuda K; Wilcox LM; Allison RS; Howard IP J Vis; 2009 Feb; 9(2):1.1-8. PubMed ID: 19271911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. van Ee R; Erkelens CJ Perception; 1995; 24(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 7617431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry. Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adaptation to vertical disparity induced-depth: implications for disparity processing. Duke PA; Wilcox LM Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 12536136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Bradshaw MF; Hibbard PB; Parton AD; Rose D; Langley K Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Binocular matching of dissimilar features in phantom stereopsis. Liu L; Stevenson SB; Schor CM Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(5):633-44. PubMed ID: 9156207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]