These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12537149)

  • 1. Systematic reviews of interpretive research: interpretive data synthesis of processed data.
    Evans D
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2002 Dec-2003 Feb; 20(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 12537149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches.
    Matua GA; Van Der Wal DM
    Nurse Res; 2015 Jul; 22(6):22-7. PubMed ID: 26168810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review.
    Walsh D; Downe S
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Apr; 50(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 15788085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assuring quality in narrative analysis.
    Bailey PH
    West J Nurs Res; 1996 Apr; 18(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 8638423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research.
    de Witt L; Ploeg J
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16866813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating Emotions Into the Critical Interpretive Synthesis.
    McFerran KS; Hense C; Medcalf L; Murphy M; Fairchild R
    Qual Health Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27055499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The critique of Heideggerian hermeneutical nursing research.
    Draucker CB
    J Adv Nurs; 1999 Aug; 30(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 10457238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing Literature in Bioethics Research: Increasing Rigour in Non-Systematic Reviews.
    McDougall R
    Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 25655982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?
    Carroll C; Booth A
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 26099483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts.
    Zimmer L
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Feb; 53(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 16441536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthesis of qualitative research and evidence-based nursing.
    Flemming K
    Br J Nurs; 2007 May 24-Jun 13; 16(10):616-20. PubMed ID: 17577168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
    Davis K; Drey N; Gould D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1386-400. PubMed ID: 19328488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Narrative in nursing research: an overview of three approaches.
    Casey B; Proudfoot D; Corbally M
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 May; 72(5):1203-15. PubMed ID: 26749518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.
    Butler A; Hall H; Copnell B
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Jun; 13(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 26790142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.
    Thomas J; Harden A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jul; 8():45. PubMed ID: 18616818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretive and critical research in sport and physical education.
    Bain LL
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Mar; 60(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2489820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach.
    Cronin P; Ryan F; Coughlan M
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jan 10-23; 17(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18399395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Evolving World of What Constitutes Qualitative Synthesis.
    Thorne S
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Jan; 29(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 30799767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Leveraging the opportunities of mixed methods in research synthesis: Key decisions in systematic mixed studies review methodology.
    Ferguson SL; Kerrigan MR; Hovey KA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):580-593. PubMed ID: 32706175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
    Angen MJ
    Qual Health Res; 2000 May; 10(3):378-95. PubMed ID: 10947483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.