BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12537640)

  • 1. Scrutinizing three trichloroethylene carcinogenicity classifications in the European Union--implications for the risk assessment process.
    Rudén C
    Int J Toxicol; 2002; 21(6):441-50. PubMed ID: 12537640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science and transscience in carcinogen risk assessment--the European Union regulatory process for trichloroethylene.
    Rudén C
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(3):257-77. PubMed ID: 12746141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scrutinizing ACGIH risk assessments: the trichloroethylene case.
    Rudén C
    Am J Ind Med; 2003 Aug; 44(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 12874854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Am J Ind Med 44:204-213, 2003. Scrutinizing ACGIH risk assessments: the trichloroethylene case.
    Wells VL
    Am J Ind Med; 2005 May; 47(5):463; author reply 464-6. PubMed ID: 15828072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of mechanistic data and the handling of scientific uncertainty in carcinogen risk assessments. The trichloroethylene example.
    Rudén C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):80-94. PubMed ID: 11846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of carcinogenicity classifications and evaluations: the case of formaldehyde.
    Binetti R; Costamagna FM; Marcello I
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 17033133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perils and promise of modern risk assessment: the example of trichloroethylene.
    Kester JE; Clewell HJ
    Clin Occup Environ Med; 2004 Aug; 4(3):497-512, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 15325318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
    Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use and evaluation of primary data in 29 trichloroethylene carcinogen risk assessments.
    Rudén C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Aug; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 11502152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ISS Carcinogens Data Bank (BDC).
    Binetti R; Ceccarelli F; Costamagna FM; D'Angiolini A; Fabri A; Ferri M; Riva G; Roazzi P; Trucchi D; Marcello I
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 18469374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health assessment of hazardous air pollutants The Netherlands.
    Vermeire T; van der Heijden K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):235-43. PubMed ID: 1670280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acrylamide and cancer risk--expert risk assessments and the public debate.
    Rudén C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Mar; 42(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 14871575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trichloroethylene and cancer in humans: recognizing the need for an evidence based analysis.
    Garabrant DH; James RC
    Toxicology; 2005 Aug; 212(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 15949887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel approach: chemical relational databases, and the role of the ISSCAN database on assessing chemical carcinogenicity.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Richard AM; Yang C
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 18469376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toxicity, biomarkers, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites: a review.
    Tabrez S; Ahmad M
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2009 Jul; 27(3):178-96. PubMed ID: 19657920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Principles and practices of health risk assessment under current EU regulations.
    Rudén C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb; 44(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16188358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legacy of corporate influence on threshold limit values and European response. Re: Am J Ind Med 44: 204-213, 2003.
    Castleman BI
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Apr; 49(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 16526063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Decree 626/94, section VII "Protection from carcinogenic agents": comparison of agents tested for evidence of carcinogenicity by the EEC and IARC].
    Fondelli MC; Seniori Costantini A
    Med Lav; 1997; 88(5):356-73. PubMed ID: 9489300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case-control study on renal cell cancer and occupational exposure to trichloroethylene. Part II: Epidemiological aspects.
    Charbotel B; Fevotte J; Hours M; Martin JL; Bergeret A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Nov; 50(8):777-87. PubMed ID: 16840435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NTP Carcinogenesis Studies of Trichloroethylene (Without Epichlorohydrin) (CAS No. 79-01-6) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).
    National Toxicology Program
    Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser; 1990 May; 243():1-174. PubMed ID: 12750750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.