107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12538063)
1. Automated image analysis technique for measurement of femoral component subsidence in total hip joint replacement.
Barker TM; Donnelly WJ
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Mar; 25(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 12538063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Submillimeter measurement of cup migration in clinical standard radiographs.
Burckhardt K; Székely G; Nötzli H; Hodler J; Gerber C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):676-88. PubMed ID: 15889554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral Torsion: Impact of Femur Position on CT and Stereoradiography Measurements.
Morvan G; Guerini H; Carré G; Vuillemin V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W93-W99. PubMed ID: 28570094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion.
Jarrett DY; Oliveira AM; Zou KH; Snyder BD; Kleinman PK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1230-3. PubMed ID: 20410408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering.
Kaptein BL; Valstar ER; Stoel BC; Rozing PM; Reiber JH
J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):873-82. PubMed ID: 12742455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2D/3D registration for measurement of implant alignment after total hip replacement.
Jaramaz B; Eckman K
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):653-61. PubMed ID: 17354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the position and orientation of artificial knee implants using markers embedded in a bone: preliminary in vitro experiments.
Imai S; Higashijima K; Ishida A; Fukuoka Y; Hoshino A; Minamitani H
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 12711240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental analysis of Model-Based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (MBRSA) on four typical prosthesis components.
Seehaus F; Emmerich J; Kaptein BL; Windhagen H; Hurschler C
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041004. PubMed ID: 19275433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting femur-insert collisions to improve precision of fluoroscopic knee arthroplasty analysis.
Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Stoel BC; Reiber JH; Valstar ER
J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 20004899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of femur and implant position on the radiographic assessment of total hip femoral implants in dogs.
Jehn CT; Manley PA
Vet Surg; 2002; 31(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 12094349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust method for registration of three-dimensional knee implant models to two-dimensional fluoroscopy images.
Mahfouz MR; Hoff WA; Komistek RD; Dennis DA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1561-74. PubMed ID: 14649746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Handling modular hip implants in model-based RSA: combined stem-head models.
Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Stoel BC; Nelissen RG; Reiber JH; Valstar ER
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2912-7. PubMed ID: 18805532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability of radiographic assessment of femoral neck-shaft and implant angulation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Gallie PA; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 18534406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for correction of periaxial malrotation of the femoral shaft: a surface-matching approach.
Khoury A; Whyne CM; Daly M; Moseley D; Bootsma G; Skrinskas T; Siewerdsen J; Jaffray D
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1380-7. PubMed ID: 17500469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral Component External Rotation Affects Knee Biomechanics: A Computational Model of Posterior-stabilized TKA.
Kia M; Wright TM; Cross MB; Mayman DJ; Pearle AD; Sculco PK; Westrich GH; Imhauser CW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 29529625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: atlas-based approach and comparative study.
Otomaru I; Nakamoto M; Kagiyama Y; Takao M; Sugano N; Tomiyama N; Tada Y; Sato Y
Med Image Anal; 2012 Feb; 16(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 22119490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthogonal view analysis for evaluating the femoral component position of total hip implants in dogs using postoperative radiographs.
Jehn CT; Bergh MS; Manley PA
Vet Surg; 2003; 32(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 12692758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated image registration for assessing three-dimensional alignment of entire lower extremity and implant position using bi-plane radiography.
Kobayashi K; Sakamoto M; Tanabe Y; Ariumi A; Sato T; Omori G; Koga Y
J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2818-22. PubMed ID: 19766224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual mobility hip arthroplasty wear measurement: Experimental accuracy assessment using radiostereometric analysis (RSA).
Pineau V; Lebel B; Gouzy S; Dutheil JJ; Vielpeau C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Oct; 96(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 20655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
