107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12538063)
21. Measuring orthopedic implant wear on standard radiographs with a precision in the 10 microm-range.
Burckhardt K; Dora C; Gerber C; Hodler J; Székely G
Med Image Anal; 2006 Aug; 10(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 16872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers.
Victor J; Van Doninck D; Labey L; Van Glabbeek F; Parizel P; Bellemans J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):683-90. PubMed ID: 19407308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiographic stereometry for non-metal-backed acetubular cups: 3D wear estimation and related uncertainty.
Sarry L; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Levai JP; Boire JY
Med Image Anal; 2005 Jun; 9(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 15854846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does Capsular Laxity Lead to Microinstability of the Native Hip?
Han S; Alexander JW; Thomas VS; Choi J; Harris JD; Doherty DB; Jeffers JRT; Noble PC
Am J Sports Med; 2018 May; 46(6):1315-1323. PubMed ID: 29505731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Avoiding rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur by using the profile of the lesser trochanter: an in vitro study.
Jaarsma RL; Verdonschot N; van der Venne R; van Kampen A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Apr; 125(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 15688229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-dimensional measurement of femoral neck anteversion and neck shaft angle.
Sangeux M; Pascoe J; Graham HK; Ramanauskas F; Cain T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 25354092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional reconstruction of human femur using consecutive computer tomography images and simulated implantation system.
Kim YH; Kim JK; Choi K
J Med Eng Technol; 2004; 28(5):205-10. PubMed ID: 15370999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency.
Tashman S; Anderst W
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Apr; 125(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 12751286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties.
Radtke K; Becher C; Noll Y; Ostermeier S
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 19898854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Simple Method for Measurement of Femoral Anteversion-Validation and Assessment of Reproducibility.
Brunner A; Eichinger M; Hengg C; Hoermann R; Brenner E; Kralinger F
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Aug; 30(8):e273-8. PubMed ID: 27031264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a digital image processing software package for the in vivo measurement of wear in cemented Charnley total hip arthroplasties.
Kennard E; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Med Eng Phys; 2006 May; 28(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 16122967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of a novel method to calculate cementless femoral stem level on craniocaudal projection radiographs.
Brand KJ; Beale BS; Hudson CC
Vet Surg; 2021 Nov; 50(8):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34545581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A volumetric model-based 2D to 3D registration method for measuring kinematics of natural knees with single-plane fluoroscopy.
Tsai TY; Lu TW; Chen CM; Kuo MY; Hsu HC
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1273-84. PubMed ID: 20384265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The migration of femoral components after total hip replacement surgery: accuracy and precision of software-aided measurements.
Decking J; Schuetz U; Decking R; Puhl W
Skeletal Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(9):521-5. PubMed ID: 12898059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy in determining relative position and orientation of total knee replacement components.
Acker S; Li R; Murray H; John PS; Banks S; Mu S; Wyss U; Deluzio K
J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):784-7. PubMed ID: 21092967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Evaluated in Standing Position: Component Alignment and In Vivo Articular Contact.
Tsai TY; Dimitriou D; Liow MH; Rubash HE; Li G; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 26730450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implementation and validation of an implant-based coordinate system for RSA migration calculation.
Laende EK; Deluzio KJ; Hennigar AW; Dunbar MJ
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2387-93. PubMed ID: 19660755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
