These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1253951)
1. Pregnancy counseling and abortion referral for patients in Federally funded family planning programs. Rosoff JI Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1253951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs. Diamond E New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994. Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules. Fed Regist; 1988 Feb; 53(21):2922-46. PubMed ID: 10285637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Counseling and referral for legal abortion in California's Bay area. Goldsmith S; Potts L; Green L; Miller R Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Jun; 2(3):14-9. PubMed ID: 5538302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion 'gag' rule. Notkin H West J Med; 1991 Aug; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bound and gagged: America's family planning network. Dryfoos JG J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10116482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State actions on reproductive health issues in 1994. Sollom T Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7796902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction of family planning legislation. Waxman HA Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Mar; 127(47):E1267. PubMed ID: 11652355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives. Family planning remains mired in politics. Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Jun; 46(23):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10118065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. State laws and the provision of family planning and abortion services in 1985. Sollom T; Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(6):262-6. PubMed ID: 3842666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues. Reitler EG Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Forrest JD; Samara R Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Courts cloud ban on abortion counseling. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(10):20. PubMed ID: 10286301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]