These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540083)

  • 1. The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery.
    Parker J; Nester CJ; Long AF; Barrie J
    Foot Ankle Int; 2003 Jan; 24(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12540083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?
    Button G; Pinney S
    Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Aug; 25(8):521-5. PubMed ID: 15363371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
    Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing.
    Hung M; Nickisch F; Beals TC; Greene T; Clegg DO; Saltzman CL
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Aug; 33(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 22995227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
    Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
    Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery®.
    Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(3):519-521. PubMed ID: 28476386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
    Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.
    Smith MV; Klein SE; Clohisy JC; Baca GR; Brophy RH; Wright RW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Mar; 94(5):468-77. PubMed ID: 22398742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures.
    Ponkilainen VT; Tukiainen EJ; Uimonen MM; Häkkinen AH; Repo JP
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Feb; 26(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 30797700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
    SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research.
    Hunt KJ; Hurwit D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(16):e118(1-9). PubMed ID: 23965711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
    Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality Measures in Foot and Ankle Care.
    Xiong G; Bennett CG; Chou L; Kamal RN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 27(8):e373-e380. PubMed ID: 30325881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.
    Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 May; 107(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 28463018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.
    Lau JT; Mahomed NM; Schon LC
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Jun; 26(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 15960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle.
    Martin RL; Irrgang JJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2007 Feb; 37(2):72-84. PubMed ID: 17366962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): Responsiveness and Minimally Important Change.
    Sierevelt IN; van Eekeren IC; Haverkamp D; Reilingh ML; Terwee CB; Kerkhoffs GM
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1339-47. PubMed ID: 26704805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring foot and ankle injury outcomes: common scales and checklists.
    Farrugia P; Goldstein C; Petrisor BA
    Injury; 2011 Mar; 42(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 21232744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery.
    Malviya A; Makwana N; Laing P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 17475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.