316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540092)
21. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments.
Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of beta-glucuronidase assay for the detection of Escherichia coli from environmental waters.
Shadix LC; Rice EW
Can J Microbiol; 1991 Dec; 37(12):908-11. PubMed ID: 1806210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. False positive fecal coliform in biosolid samples assayed using A-1 medium.
Baker KH; Redmond B; Herson DS
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16121511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative performance of Colisure.
McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.
Fricker CR; Eldred BJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 19874482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of the MicroSnap Coliform and E. coli test system for enumeration and detection of coliforms and E. coli in a variety of foods. Performance Tested Method 071302.
Meighan P
J AOAC Int; 2014; 97(2):453-78. PubMed ID: 24830158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of fecal coliform agar and violet red bile lactose agar for fecal coliform enumeration in foods.
Leclercq A; Wanegue C; Baylac P
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):1631-8. PubMed ID: 11916678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of methods used to enumerate Escherichia coli in conventionally treated sewage sludge.
Eccles JP; Searle R; Holt D; Dennis PJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 96(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 14723699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli in foods by the SimPlate coliform and E. coli color indicator method and conventional culture methods: collaborative study.
Feldsine PT; Lienau AH; Roa NH; Green ST
J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(5):1318-33. PubMed ID: 16385981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Culture-dependent enumeration methods failed to simultaneously detect disinfectant-injured and genetically modified Escherichia coli in drinking water.
Li J; Liu L; Yang D; Liu WL; Shen ZQ; Qu HM; Qiu ZG; Hou AM; Wang DN; Ding CS; Li JW; Guo JH; Jin M
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 May; 19(5):720-726. PubMed ID: 28406501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of chromocult coliform agar for coliform and Escherichia coil detection in foods.
Turner KM; Restaino L; Frampton EW
J Food Prot; 2000 Apr; 63(4):539-41. PubMed ID: 10772222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. False-positive coliform reaction mediated by Aeromonas in the Colilert defined substrate technology system.
Landre JP; Gavriel AA; Lamb AJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 1998 May; 26(5):352-4. PubMed ID: 9674164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EU Drinking Water Directive reference methods for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli compared with alternative methods.
Schets FM; Nobel PJ; Strating S; Mooijman KA; Engels GB; Brouwer A
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002; 34(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 11874547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A long-term study comparing membrane filtration with Colilert defined substrates in detecting fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in natural waters.
Buckalew DW; Hartman LJ; Grimsley GA; Martin AE; Register KM
J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16338057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of four β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase-based commercial culture methods used to detect Escherichia coli and total coliforms in water.
Maheux AF; Dion-Dupont V; Bouchard S; Bisson MA; Bergeron MG; Rodriguez MJ
J Water Health; 2015 Jun; 13(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 26042967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the recoveries of Escherichia coli and total coliforms from drinking water by the MI agar method and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved membrane filter method.
Brenner KP; Rankin CC; Sivaganesan M; Scarpino PV
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 62(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 8572697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of commercially available Escherichia coli enumeration tests: implications for attaining water quality standards.
Hamilton WP; Kim M; Thackston EL
Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):4869-78. PubMed ID: 16313941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray method.
Aulenbach BT
Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Feb; 161(1-4):147-59. PubMed ID: 19165613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of colilert-marine water for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in the marine environment.
Palmer CJ; Tsai YL; Lang AL; Sangermano LR
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1993 Mar; 59(3):786-90. PubMed ID: 8481005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
