These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540225)

  • 1. Effect of endodontic instrument taper on post retention.
    Pettiette MT; Phillips C; Trope M
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 12540225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
    Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sealer area associated with cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha and warm coated carrier filling systems in canals prepared with various rotary NiTi systems.
    Gulsahi K; Cehreli ZC; Kuraner T; Dagli FT
    Int Endod J; 2007 Apr; 40(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 17309742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment.
    Valois CR; Navarro M; Ramos AA; de Castro AJ; Gahyva SM
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11450685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer-based composite cement in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 12691274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals.
    Singla M; Aggarwal V; Logani A; Shah N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e105-10. PubMed ID: 20219574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
    Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
    Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer.
    Vano M; Cury AH; Goracci C; Chieffi N; Gabriele M; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 18621457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.
    Gu LS; Ling JQ; Wei X; Huang XY
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 18081804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer.
    Kosti E; Lambrianidis T; Economides N; Neofitou C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16409328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment.
    Masiero AV; Barletta FB
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15606816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of the diameter and taper of size #30, 0.04 nickel-titanium rotary files.
    Lask JT; Walker MP; Kulild JC; Cunningham KP; Shull PA
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1171-3. PubMed ID: 17174675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):716-23. PubMed ID: 16916361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of endodontic debris removal as obtained by rotary instrumentation coupled with ultrasonic irrigation.
    Passarinho-Neto JG; Marchesan MA; Ferreira RB; Silva RG; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Dec; 32(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 17201755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mechanical versus thermal removal of gutta-percha on the quality of the apical seal following post space preparation.
    Hiltner RS; Kulild JC; Weller RN
    J Endod; 1992 Sep; 18(9):451-4. PubMed ID: 9796515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.