270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540394)
21. Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults.
Salamone LM; Fuerst T; Visser M; Kern M; Lang T; Dockrell M; Cauley JA; Nevitt M; Tylavsky F; Lohman TG
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Jul; 89(1):345-52. PubMed ID: 10904070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of body composition measurements obtained by two fan-beam DXA instruments.
Sakai Y; Ito H; Meno T; Numata M; Jingu S
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16785080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Body composition in patients with short bowel syndrome: an assessment by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA).
Carlsson E; Bosaeus I; Nordgren S
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Jun; 58(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 15164105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Verdich C; Barbe P; Petersen M; Grau K; Ward L; Macdonald I; Sørensen TI; Oppert JM
Diabetes Metab; 2011 Jun; 37(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 21236715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Body composition in prepubertal girls: comparison of six methods.
Treuth MS; Butte NF; Wong WW; Ellis KJ
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1352-9. PubMed ID: 11571599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes.
Kerr A; Slater GJ; Byrne N
Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 28382898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interchangeability of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in piglets and infants.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 Aug; 78(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 12885703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prediction of appendicular skeletal and fat mass in children: excellent concordance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging.
Bridge P; Pocock NA; Nguyen T; Munns C; Cowell CT; Thompson MW
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2009 Sep; 22(9):795-804. PubMed ID: 19960889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. QDR 4500A DXA overestimates fat-free mass compared with criterion methods.
Tylavsky F; Lohman T; Blunt BA; Schoeller DA; Fuerst T; Cauley JA; Nevitt MC; Visser M; Harris TB
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2003 Mar; 94(3):959-65. PubMed ID: 12433854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.
Norcross J; Van Loan MD
Br J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 38(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 15273189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of air-displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of fat-free mass in elderly subjects.
Bertoli S; Battezzati A; Testolin G; Bedogni G
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Nov; 62(11):1282-6. PubMed ID: 17657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of bone mass and body composition measurements in small subjects with pencil beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Feb; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14963057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of DXA and CT in the assessment of body composition in premenopausal women with obesity and anorexia nervosa.
Bredella MA; Ghomi RH; Thomas BJ; Torriani M; Brick DJ; Gerweck AV; Misra M; Klibanski A; Miller KK
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2010 Nov; 18(11):2227-33. PubMed ID: 20111013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deep learning-based fully automated body composition analysis of thigh CT: comparison with DXA measurement.
Yoo HJ; Kim YJ; Hong H; Hong SH; Chae HD; Choi JY
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7601-7611. PubMed ID: 35435440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure body mass during short- to medium-term trials of nutrition and exercise interventions.
Marinangeli CP; Kassis AN
Nutr Rev; 2013 Jun; 71(6):332-42. PubMed ID: 23731444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
