270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12540394)
41. Measurement of changes in soft tissue mass and fat mass with weight change: pencil- versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Health ABC Study.
Tylavsky FA; Fuerst T; Nevitt M; Dockrell M; Wan JY; Cauley J; Harris T
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():94-7. PubMed ID: 10865715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.
Libouban H; Simon Y; Silve C; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M; Chappard D
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 12665635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cross-calibration of pencil-beam (DPX-NT) and fan-beam (QDR-4500C) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for sarcopenia.
Ito K; Tsushita K; Muramoto A; Kanzaki H; Nohara T; Shimizu H; Nakazawa T; Harada A
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 77(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 26663943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of a model for total body protein mass based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with a reference four-component model.
Fuller NJ; Wells JC; Elia M
Br J Nutr; 2001 Jul; 86(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 11432764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Location of body fat and body size impacts DXA soft tissue measures: a simulation study.
Valentine RJ; Misic MM; Kessinger RB; Mojtahedi MC; Evans EM
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Apr; 62(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 17457339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The evaluation of consistency between body composition assessments in pediatric population using pencil beam and fan beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers.
Pludowski P; Jaworski M; Matusik H; Kobylinska M; Klimek P; Lorenc RS
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 20171570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.
Toombs RJ; Ducher G; Shepherd JA; De Souza MJ
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Jan; 20(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21760631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Estimation of thigh muscle cross-sectional area by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in frail elderly patients.
Hansen RD; Williamson DA; Finnegan TP; Lloyd BD; Grady JN; Diamond TH; Smith EU; Stavrinos TM; Thompson MW; Gwinn TH; Allen BJ; Smerdely PI; Diwan AD; Singh NA; Singh MA
Am J Clin Nutr; 2007 Oct; 86(4):952-8. PubMed ID: 17921370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of DXA and water measurements of body fat following gastric bypass surgery and a physiological model of body water, fat, and muscle composition.
Levitt DG; Beckman LM; Mager JR; Valentine B; Sibley SD; Beckman TR; Kellogg TA; Ikramuddin S; Earthman CP
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2010 Sep; 109(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 20558754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Impact of body-composition methodology on the composition of weight loss and weight gain.
Pourhassan M; Schautz B; Braun W; Gluer CC; Bosy-Westphal A; Müller MJ
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 May; 67(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 23422922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.
Hammami M; Koo WW; Hockman EM
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2004; 28(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 15449572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Assessing body composition and changes in body composition. Another look at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Lohman TG; Harris M; Teixeira PJ; Weiss L
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():45-54. PubMed ID: 10865709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in humans: comparison of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Levine JA; Abboud L; Barry M; Reed JE; Sheedy PF; Jensen MD
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Feb; 88(2):452-6. PubMed ID: 10658010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Validation of DXA body composition estimates in obese men and women.
LaForgia J; Dollman J; Dale MJ; Withers RT; Hill AM
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2009 Apr; 17(4):821-6. PubMed ID: 19131939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validation of air-displacement plethysmography for estimation of body fat mass in healthy elderly subjects.
Bosy-Westphal A; Mast M; Eichhorn C; Becker C; Kutzner D; Heller M; Müller MJ
Eur J Nutr; 2003 Aug; 42(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 12923652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Koo WW; Hammami M; Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Dec; 23(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 15637212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. DXA body composition: theory and practice.
Kelly TL; Berger N; Richardson TL
Appl Radiat Isot; 1998; 49(5-6):511-3. PubMed ID: 9569530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of bioimpedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of fat mass in hemodialysis patients.
Molfino A; Don BR; Kaysen GA
Nephron Clin Pract; 2012; 122(3-4):127-33. PubMed ID: 23689544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
